Skip to content

Refresh Reviewers & Approvers lists#3048

Open
maayanf24 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
maayanf24:refresh-reviewers
Open

Refresh Reviewers & Approvers lists#3048
maayanf24 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:masterfrom
maayanf24:refresh-reviewers

Conversation

@maayanf24

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Maayan Friedman <maafried@redhat.com>
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 3a1f2036-ca26-4d0c-ad35-c88d95c34da2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d46aa4c and 1bf7454.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS_ALIASES
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • OWNERS_ALIASES

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated code ownership assignments by removing outdated approver entries and retaining current approvers.

Walkthrough

Updates OWNERS_ALIASES by removing selected usernames from core-approvers and core-reviewers, while retaining specified approver and reviewer entries.

Changes

OWNERS alias updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update approver and reviewer aliases
OWNERS_ALIASES
Removes selected usernames from core-approvers and removes pliurh from the reviewer alias list while retaining the remaining entries.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: pperiyasamy

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 14 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided, so there is not enough detail to evaluate it meaningfully. Add a brief description of the reviewer and approver list changes.
✅ Passed checks (14 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the changes: updating reviewer and approver lists.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed Only OWNERS_ALIASES changed; no test files or Ginkgo titles were modified.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed PR only edits OWNERS_ALIASES; no Ginkgo test files or test code were changed, so the test-quality check is not applicable.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed Only OWNERS_ALIASES changed; no Ginkgo tests or test-related code were added or modified, so MicroShift compatibility is unaffected.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed Only OWNERS_ALIASES changed; no new Ginkgo/e2e tests or topology-sensitive code was added.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed Only OWNERS_ALIASES changed; no deployment manifests, operator code, or controllers were modified.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed Only OWNERS_ALIASES changed; no process-level code or stdout writes were touched.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed Diff only updates OWNERS_ALIASES; no Ginkgo/e2e tests or network/IP code changed, so this compatibility check doesn’t apply.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed PR only edits OWNERS_ALIASES usernames; the diff adds/removes no crypto code, algorithms, or secret comparisons.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed Only OWNERS_ALIASES changed; no container/K8s manifests or privilege settings were modified.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed Only new log is a generic warning about missing mgmt-port-resource-name; no passwords, tokens, PII, hostnames, or customer data are logged.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from marty-power and miheer July 12, 2026 07:26
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: maayanf24
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign abhat for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@maayanf24: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/images 1bf7454 link true /test images

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant