Skip to content

8379433: Throwing proper exception for invalid encapsulation length in Hybrid - #664

Open
rm-gh-8 wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:pr/662from
rm-gh-8:JDK-8379433-V25
Open

8379433: Throwing proper exception for invalid encapsulation length in Hybrid#664
rm-gh-8 wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:pr/662from
rm-gh-8:JDK-8379433-V25

Conversation

@rm-gh-8

@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backporting JDK-8379433: Throwing proper exception for invalid encapsulation length in Hybrid.

This PR fixes the wrong exception type thrown when a hybrid key exchange receives a bad message.

For parity with Oracle JDK.

Ran related tests on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

make test TEST=test/jdk/sun/security/ssl/HybridKeyExchange/TestHybrid.java

Results:

windows-x64-specific-test.log
macos-aarch64-specific-test.log
linux-x64-specific-test.log
linux-aarch64-specific-test.log



Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8379433 needs maintainer approval

Integration blocker

 ⚠️ Dependency #662 must be integrated first

Issue

  • JDK-8379433: Throwing proper exception for invalid encapsulation length in Hybrid (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/664/head:pull/664
$ git checkout pull/664

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/664
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev.git pull/664/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 664

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 664

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk25u-dev/pull/664.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@rm-gh-8
rm-gh-8 marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2026 12:50
@bridgekeeper

bridgekeeper Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Welcome back rmesde! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/662 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk Bot changed the title Backport cdd64dbb5da3c6f2e316397cee71838984b323bf 8379433: Throwing proper exception for invalid encapsulation length in Hybrid Jul 15, 2026
@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 15, 2026
@mlbridge

mlbridge Bot commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Webrevs

@rm-gh-8

rm-gh-8 commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/approval request for backport of JDK-8379433: Throwing proper exception for invalid encapsulation length in Hybrid.

This PR fixes the wrong exception type thrown when a hybrid key exchange receives a bad message.

For parity with Oracle JDK.

Low risk - only changes error handling for malformed inputs

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rm-gh-8
8379433: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Jul 16, 2026
@openjdk openjdk Bot removed the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Jul 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant