Meta: new repo structure with per-directory projects#37
Draft
inge4pres wants to merge 6 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <fgualazzi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <fgualazzi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <fgualazzi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <fgualazzi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <fgualazzi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: inge4pres <fgualazzi@gmail.com>
agagniere
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reason for this PR
It's a pre-requisite for #19.
Since we cannot have multiple
build.zigfiles in each folder and re-use all the existing build commands, we need to come up with a strategy to host multiple prohects as indivual modules inside this repo.Details
This PR Proposes to confine the existing SDK into an
opentelemetry-sdkfolder that will be exported to consumers of this repository with thesdkmodule name.Please upvote or dowvote in the comments the proposed approach. There has been a limited discussion on the options, and we would love to enumerate more before committing to what's proposed here.
The goal is to allow Zig users to
zig fetchthis repo only while still accessing all the typical OTel packages functionalities: sdk, semconv. proto, etc...