Decode FORS indices similarly to WOTS - #1839
Closed
GillonB wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
As proposed by NIST's David Cooper: https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/88tuvtb7nN4/m/DA1QCoJWBAAJ
GillonB
marked this pull request as draft
July 10, 2024 10:24
Member
|
Because we're pulling out SPHINCS+ implementation from PQClean, we'd prefer to see this change made first in PQClean, and then our automated scripts can pull it in. Would you be able to do that? |
Member
|
Closing due to inactivity. Additionally, rather than updating the SPHINCS+ code in place, we will presumably be replacing it with the final version of SLH-DSA whenever it lands upstream. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update the decoding of the FORS indices as proposed by latest NIST changes. This has already been proposed in the sphincsplus repo (sphincs/sphincsplus#51). Would be good to have the same for liboqs as this change will eventually land. https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/88tuvtb7nN4/m/DA1QCoJWBAAJ
relates to #1838