docs(v0.44): preserve Beta.2 closure verification evidence - #1314
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
APIError: Insufficient Balance |
Deploying openelement with
|
| Latest commit: |
f780f2f
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://051a1150.lessjs.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://docs-beta2-closure-evidence.lessjs.pages.dev |
Contributor
|
APIError: Insufficient Balance |
10 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Beta.2 closure verification evidence must be durable in the repository (Beta.1 pattern: PR #1279), not left as untracked local files.
Owner
Thinker, stage #1288 closure.
Before
Verifier report, re-verification addendum, and verifier-added gate-teeth tests existed only as untracked local files.
After
Why-not-second-owner
Evidence preservation is docs-only; no semantic surface.
Evidence
This PR's CI.
Scope
docs/evidence + one test file. No production code.
Risk
None material; the test file runs in the standard suite.