Skip to content

One,two and three-wayANOVA on fashion MNIST - #13

Open
skyrb wants to merge 5 commits into
nishnik:masterfrom
skyrb:master
Open

One,two and three-wayANOVA on fashion MNIST#13
skyrb wants to merge 5 commits into
nishnik:masterfrom
skyrb:master

Conversation

@skyrb

@skyrb skyrb commented Dec 31, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@skyrb

skyrb commented Dec 31, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Implemented fashion MNIST and ANOVA on the result w.r.t to learning rate

@skyrb

skyrb commented Jan 4, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

please review

@nishnik

nishnik commented Jan 4, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

You can use statsmodel for ANOVA.
Example: https://plot.ly/python/anova/
As you have already set it up for Fashion MNIST, try doing the ANOVA on it.
#12

@skyrb skyrb changed the title ANOVA on fashion MNIST One,two and three-wayANOVA on fashion MNIST Jan 4, 2019
@skyrb

skyrb commented Jan 4, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I have made changes so please review..

@skyrb

skyrb commented Jan 7, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

please review,i think today is last day

@nishnik

nishnik commented Jan 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Hi, this looks good to me.
We can see that the learning rate has more role to play than the number of layers.
There is a minor glitch; you shouldn't run the ANOVA on Mean Accuracy instead on different epochs like either the 5th or the last epoch. Because the model with small learning rate hasn't learned much in the first few epochs and that get counted too. Ideally we should take the epoch with highest val accuracy for each set of experiment.

@nishnik

nishnik commented Jan 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

And don't worry about KWoC evaluation. They will value your contribution rather than the number of PRs accepted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants