Skip to content

fix: reject OTKs on QR contact-code decode (#51) #60

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
chtnnh wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix: reject OTKs on QR contact-code decode (#51) #60

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
32d1fee
fix: reject OTKs on QR contact-code decode (#51)
chtnnh Jul 21, 2026
497a9ac
chore: bump Expo SDK 57 patch deps for install --check
chtnnh Jul 23, 2026
2220138
chore: regenerate package-lock for npm ci peer resolution
chtnnh Jul 23, 2026
8d6eaac
chore: bump expo-dev-client to ~57.0.9 for install --check
chtnnh Jul 23, 2026
1d2f720
chore: sync Expo deps lockfile (restore emnapi peers for npm ci)
chtnnh Jul 23, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/FORWARD-SECRECY.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Wire layout of sealed payloads is unchanged (relays still cannot tell modes apar
| Pitfall | Handling |
|--------|----------|
| No key server | QR SPK + in-band OTK replenishment |
| Same QR scanned by two people | SPK only on QR — both deliver; OTKs are exclusive in-band |
| Same QR scanned by two people | SPK only on QR (encode + decode reject OTKs); exclusive OTKs in-band |
| In-flight after SPK rotation | SPK ring retained 6h |
| Trial-decrypt cost | OTK pool ceiling (24) + `OPEN_SECRET_CAP` (28); newest-first |
| Forged prekeys | SPK signature required; bad bundles rejected |
Expand Down
Loading