Recording multiple AI Aircraft surrounding user - #124
Open
caveman77 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
please find here a succesful attempt to record the aircrafts surrounding the user one. Regularly the simconnectMSFS singleton will wake up and ask the aircraft list around. Then it will request a set of information for a limited period. If the aircraft is still around on the next wake up, the recording will continue. If not, the recording will stop by itself (a bit later).
I have tested it on FsLTL and Vatsim. It does work well and it is difficult to tell during the replay that it was a replay.
For one hour with 25 aircrafts it does work smoothly. Longer would not be a main issue, knowing that all is stored in RAM.
I tried to keep as much as possible existing features but didn't succeed on:
Thing that would need to be improved:
I'm open to improve this evolution.
Kind regards