Update Query routing decisions page#3171
Conversation
Thanks for the review, @ConorNeo. Actually, the image is the only thing I didn't change, but looking at it now, I think it needs a bit of updating. It talks about the server leaders instead of databases, and also has just one READ possibility, where there should be two. |
I think I might be going crazy. I can see no mention of "server leaders" in the image? What is the second read possibility of which you talk? :) |
I mean, we say "Is the local member the leader for that database?" but servers can't be leaders anymore; one of the databases is the leader for the rest of the same databases.
|
|
Hey @ConorNeo, could you please review the diagram? I have updated it according to the described steps, and if you are happy with it, I'll ask Lidia to reproduce it in the Neo4j style and colours. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we want to update the image, should we add also 'Target database is a sharded database' to the step 3?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure I understand. There are no sharded databases here. Do you mean to also add what the query routing decisions would be if the target database is an SPD?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe @ConorNeo can chime in here. I have no idea what the differences would be. We'll also need to update the steps.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you mean to also add what the query routing decisions would be if the target database is an SPD?
yes, that's what I meant 😄 To add information about query routing in an SPD. But only if we want it. This is just a question.
Co-authored-by: Natalia Ivakina <82437520+NataliaIvakina@users.noreply.github.com>
|
This PR includes documentation updates Updated pages: |

No description provided.