ci(release): rewrite fork handles to "upstream" across the whole release page - #317
Closed
navyas321 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
ci(release): rewrite fork handles to "upstream" across the whole release page#317navyas321 wants to merge 1 commit into
navyas321 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ase page The hero gate already kept fork/maintainer handles out of the stable hero, but the technical sections and the collapsed plumbing block still published them -- so a maintainer's name was on the release page either way. Handles are now REWRITTEN rather than dropped: the changelog entry survives minus the name. scrub_attribution() substitutes "upstream" only when the subject does not already carry the word, so "Eliminate all divergences with Nonary VRR10 upstream" does not come out doubled, and a subject that needs the word to still make sense gains it. Runs before sentence_case so a handle at the start of a subject still yields a capitalized bullet. The hero gate keeps testing the RAW note, since a note that needed scrubbing is provenance-flavoured writing and that is the signal being read. Invariant 29 now asserts no handle survives anywhere while the entry itself remains; new invariant 31 covers the collapsed plumbing block and all four real 0.5.0 subject spellings. Full suite passes locally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011ssiryy9pATyJo32UUNxjX
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The hero gate kept fork/maintainer handles (
nonary,wjbeckett,cgutman,moonlight-qt) out of the stable hero, but the technical sections and the collapsed plumbing block still published them — so a fork maintainer's name reached the release page regardless.Change
Handles are rewritten, not deleted, everywhere on the page. The changelog entry survives; only the name goes.
scrub_attribution()substitutesupstreamonly when the subject doesn't already carry the word — soEliminate all divergences with Nonary VRR10 upstreamdoesn't come out as...with upstream VRR10 upstream, whileGuard Nonary VRR features behind version checksgains the word rather than reading as if we guard our own. It runs beforesentence_case, so a handle at the start of a subject still yields a capitalized bullet.The hero gate still tests the raw note: a note that needed scrubbing is provenance-flavoured writing, and that's the signal being read. Host types and protocols (Artemis, Apollo, Sunshine, Moonlight) are a real user-facing choice and remain untouched.
Verification
scripts/check-changelog-invariants.shpasses in full:🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_011ssiryy9pATyJo32UUNxjX