Starting here? See
docs/mass-gap-roadmap.mdfor a short human-facing summary of the project's goal and architecture.Per-file informal summaries (auto-generated, English + LaTeX):
summary/— declaration-by-declaration walk-through of the core files, with proof dependencies cross-linked to source.
Status: formalisation of the d ≥ 2 lattice Yang–Mills mass gap
at strong coupling, via the Dobrushin uniqueness method
(Chatterjee 2026, Ch. 16). Both headline theorems
(ym_mass_gap_exponential_decay, ym_mass_gap_rate_exists) are
fully proved as of PR #2 (2026-05-04) — zero sorries, zero project
axioms.
Both in LGT/MassGap/StrongCoupling.lean. For U(n) Wilson lattice
gauge theory on (ℤ/Nℤ)^d with d ≥ 2, N ≥ 3, n ≥ 1, coupling
β < 1/(32n(d−1)) (equivalently β < 1/(4n · maxNeighbors d)):
1. Algebraic decay (ym_mass_gap_exponential_decay):
|⟨Re Tr(U_p) · Re Tr(U_q)⟩_c|
≤ 32 n² / (1 − α) · α^((latticePlaquetteDist p q − 1) / 2)
where α = dobrushinAlpha(n, d, β) < 1 and latticePlaquetteDist is
the periodic L¹ distance between plaquette anchor sites. The
exponent uses Nat subtraction and division (saturating at 0 for
close-range plaquettes). The factor of 1/2 is forced by the
geometry: one shared-plaquette influence-graph step displaces a
link anchor by up to 2 L¹ site-units, so α^k decay in graph-step
count yields (log α) / 2 rate in L¹ plaqDist.
2. Existential mass-gap rate (ym_mass_gap_rate_exists,
companion form, requires β > 0):
∃ m > 0, |⟨Re Tr(U_p) · Re Tr(U_q)⟩_c|
≤ 32 n² / (α (1 − α)) · exp(−m · latticePlaquetteDist p q)
with m = (−log α) / 2. This packages the algebraic bound as the
canonical exponential-decay statement of mass gap.
The theorems are stated for U(n); other compact gauge groups
G ⊆ U(n) require supplying the HasGaugeTrace instance.
Lean infrastructure (proved, axiom-clean):
- Wilson action, gauge invariance, the YM measure, the Gibbs specification framework, DLR identity, Dobrushin-condition verification, U(n) instances.
- The distance-parameterised wrapper
ym_mass_gap_strong_couplingthat takes ~10 hypotheses (continuity,dobrushinAlpha < 1, a caller-supplied distance with refl/triangle/nearest-neighbour support) and discharges the ~28 hypotheses ofym_mass_gap_2pt_via_multisitefrom first principles. - Periodic-torus distance machinery in
LGT/Lattice/LatticeDistance.lean(ZMod.periodicDist,latticeSiteDist,latticePlaquetteDist,linkAmbientAdj,ambientLinkGraph,linkGraphDist). - The geometric closure (this PR):
linkGraphDist_support(Dobrushin α^k decay carried through the shared-plaquette link graph),boundary_sum_bound(16-term boundary-link sum bounded by16 · α^((plaqDist−1)/2) / (1−α)), and the two headline theorems.
See docs/mass-gap-roadmap.md for a two-page human-facing summary, docs/mass-gap-proof-outline.md for the full proof outline, and docs/codex-review.txt for independent review records.
Verified by #print axioms on a fresh build:
#print axioms ym_mass_gap_strong_coupling
-- propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
#print axioms ym_mass_gap_exponential_decay
-- propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
#print axioms ym_mass_gap_rate_exists
-- propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound
Only Lean foundationals — no project axioms, no Mathlib analytic axioms beyond standard. The wider repository (Wilson action, YM measure, Gibbs spec, DLR, Dobrushin verification) is also fully sorry-free and axiom-clean as of PR #2.
Eight layers (1–7 are the main Dobrushin path; 8 is an independent bridge to tensor-network models):
-
Lattice geometry (
Lattice/CellComplex.lean) — sites, links, plaquettes on (ℤ/Nℤ)^d with boundary links and shift operations. -
Gauge fields (
GaugeField/) — G-valued connections on links, plaquette holonomy, gauge covariance, U(n) instantiation with trace bounds |Re Tr(U)| ≤ n. -
Wilson action (
WilsonAction/) — plaquette cost, Wilson action S(U) = β Σ(n − Re Tr U_p), Boltzmann weight, gauge invariance. -
YM measure (
MassGap/YMMeasure.lean) — product Haar measure, YM probability measure via withDensity, partition function Z > 0, ymExpect bridge to integrals. -
Gibbs specification (
Gibbs/) — YM as a GibbsSpec on link lattice, DLR identity (ymMeasure_isGibbs), Dobrushin condition at strong coupling (ymDobrushinCondition). -
Dobrushin correlation decay (in
markov-semigroups) — canonical maximal coupling with Giry measurability, Dobrushin coupling via minimum-disagreement + Prokhorov compactness, single-site disintegration, multi-site covariance bounds via condKernel disintegration, Neumann series exponential decay. -
Mass gap assembly (
MassGap/StrongCoupling.lean) — discharge integrability/measurability from continuity, influence bounds via action splitting, link distance, U(n) specialization. -
EKR-Dobrushin bridge (
Bridge/) — connects tensor renormalization group (TRG) convergence to Dobrushin mass gap. For any nearest-neighbor spin model with an EKR-style certificate (hat-tensor contraction λ < 1), derives exponential correlation decay on the original lattice. Zero sorries, zero axioms. Applicable to Ising, XY, O(3) NLSM, Potts, or any model with a tensor RG certificate. Seedocs/mass-gap-blueprint.mdfor details.
Also: 2D mass gap via Doeblin (MassGap2D.lean, partially complete).
LGT/
Lattice/CellComplex.lean -- cell complex on (ℤ/Nℤ)^d
GaugeField/
Connection.lean -- connections, holonomy, gauge covariance
GaugeGroup.lean -- HasGaugeTrace typeclass
UnitaryGroup.lean -- U(n) instantiation + trace bounds
WilsonAction/
PlaquetteAction.lean -- Wilson action, Boltzmann weight
GaugeInvariance.lean -- S(g·U) = S(U)
Gibbs/
YMSpec.lean -- YM as GibbsSpec
YMDobrushin.lean -- Dobrushin condition verification
YMIsGibbs.lean -- DLR identity (ymMeasure is Gibbs)
MassGap/
YMMeasure.lean -- YM probability measure
DobrushinVerification.lean -- influence bound algebra
GaugeFixing.lean -- correlation bound wiring
MassGap3D.lean -- d≥3 mass gap theorem
StrongCoupling.lean -- final assembly + U(n)
MassGap2D.lean -- 2D mass gap (Doeblin path)
Bridge/
TensorGibbsSpec.lean -- Gibbs spec from tensor network
TensorDobrushin.lean -- influence bounds + Dobrushin condition
ScaleTransfer.lean -- RG scale transfer (coarse → fine)
O3MassGap.lean -- assembly for O(3) / general models
docs/
mass-gap-roadmap.md -- short human-facing summary (START HERE)
mass-gap-completion-plan.md -- detailed record of the geometric closure
mass-gap-proof-outline.md -- proof outline
mass-gap-blueprint.md -- full math blueprint
mass-gap-blueprint.tex -- LaTeX version
mass-gap-proof.md -- 2D Doeblin path notes
codex-review*.txt -- historical review record
- Lean 4:
leanprover/lean4:v4.29.0(pinned inlean-toolchain; installed automatically byelanwhen you enter the directory). - Mathlib v4.29.0
- markov-semigroups — Dobrushin uniqueness theory, canonical maximal coupling, covariance bounds, Neumann series, single-site disintegration, condKernel wiring.
- gaussian-field — lattice site types.
All resolved via lakefile.toml; lake-manifest.json pins the
exact commits.
git clone https://github.com/mrdouglasny/lgt.git
cd lgt
lake build # fetches deps on first run via the pinned manifestFull build takes ~15–30 min on first run (Mathlib cache download + local compilation). Incremental rebuilds are seconds.
To verify the main result builds and the axiom footprint is clean:
lake build LGT.MassGap.StrongCouplingNew collaborator? Read in this order:
docs/mass-gap-roadmap.md— two-page human summary: goal, status, approach, and what was built.docs/mass-gap-completion-plan.md— the detailed, phase-by-phase record of the geometric closure, with concrete lemma signatures.docs/mass-gap-proof-outline.md— deeper math context for the proofs.
The strong-coupling mass gap is complete (zero sorries, zero
project axioms). Natural directions to extend: the 2D Doeblin path
(MassGap2D.lean, partially complete) and the RG scale-transfer
bridge (Bridge/, several fields still stated as hypotheses).
Conventions: this project follows Mathlib-style naming and layout
(see CLAUDE.md in the root for the working-methods summary; detailed
rules in ~/Documents/GitHub/mathlib-ready/docs/ for those with
access). Before writing a new lemma, check whether it exists upstream
or in sibling projects — the markov-semigroups and gaussian-field
libraries cover most of the Dobrushin / lattice-geometry machinery
already. Axioms are budgeted: see research-dev/library/lean/AXIOM_MANAGEMENT.md
for the vetting protocol if a new one is truly needed.
How to propose a change: fork, branch, PR to main. For anything
non-trivial, open an issue first to coordinate. Commit messages:
concise, describe the why.
- S. Chatterjee, Gauge Theory Lecture Notes (2026), Ch 15–16
- R. L. Dobrushin, "Description of a random field by means of conditional probabilities" (1968)
- H.-O. Georgii, Gibbs Measures and Phase Transitions (1988), §8
- K. G. Wilson, "Confinement of quarks," Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 2445
Michael R. Douglas (CMSA, Harvard), with Fred Rajasekaran.
Both headline theorems (ym_mass_gap_exponential_decay and
ym_mass_gap_rate_exists) have been checked at commit
ec975bd by the
Lean FRO comparator — an
independent judge that re-exports the kernel terms via lean4export,
verifies the solution's elaborated theorem statement matches the
challenge's, and replays the proof through Lean's kernel under a
permitted-axiom whitelist. The run reported:
Lean default kernel accepts the solution
Your solution is okay!
with the whitelist {propext, Quot.sound, Classical.choice}. The macOS
run used comparator/scripts/fake-landrun.sh (the official insecure
shim), so the kernel-acceptance and axiom-whitelist guarantees hold but
the sandbox guarantee does not — for adversarial use one would re-run
on Linux with real landrun.
Copyright (c) 2026 Michael R. Douglas. Released under the Apache 2.0 license.