chore: point repository links at moxin-org/aisle

README.md

@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ and [getting started](docs/getting-started.md) for manual rollouts and NVIDIA
 setup. Never install with bare pip/conda.
 
 The supported Linux clone and archive quickstarts passed in
-[run 34082153283](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/actions/runs/34082153283).
+[run 34082153283](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/actions/runs/34082153283).
 These are development runs; the benchmark's independent-user, release and
 physical-evidence gates remain outstanding.
 

docs/AISLE-technical-report.md

@@ -2840,25 +2840,25 @@ understood.
 
 | # | Gap | Why it matters | Section |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| [#264](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/264) | Skill manifests record evidence but not **applicability** | As the library grows, undifferentiated same-capability entries make selection harder — the accumulation benefit can invert | §5.5 |
-| [#265](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/265) | No **sandbox trust tier** | ADR-37's floor leaves an agent no legitimate way to declare an unproven node so its graph validates | §5.5 |
-| [#266](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/266) | **Idea trees are not retained** | The pre-registrations that make findings falsifiable are gone; "3/4 expectations met" is currently unverifiable prose | §8.5 |
-| [#267](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/267) | **SFT label undecided**: `joint_cmd` vs `joint_cmd_safe` | Structural safety and clean credit assignment pull against each other; must be settled before any fine-tune | §10.11 |
-| [#268](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/268) | **No determinism layer for inference** | The staleness floor couples sim time to wall time, so a loaded host can change the trajectory with every seed identical | §10.11 |
-| [#269](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/269) | **"Safe Learning" is undefined** in the project's own naming gloss | Students reasonably expect a training loop and find none | §3.5 |
+| [#264](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/264) | Skill manifests record evidence but not **applicability** | As the library grows, undifferentiated same-capability entries make selection harder — the accumulation benefit can invert | §5.5 |
+| [#265](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/265) | No **sandbox trust tier** | ADR-37's floor leaves an agent no legitimate way to declare an unproven node so its graph validates | §5.5 |
+| [#266](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/266) | **Idea trees are not retained** | The pre-registrations that make findings falsifiable are gone; "3/4 expectations met" is currently unverifiable prose | §8.5 |
+| [#267](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/267) | **SFT label undecided**: `joint_cmd` vs `joint_cmd_safe` | Structural safety and clean credit assignment pull against each other; must be settled before any fine-tune | §10.11 |
+| [#268](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/268) | **No determinism layer for inference** | The staleness floor couples sim time to wall time, so a loaded host can change the trajectory with every seed identical | §10.11 |
+| [#269](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/269) | **"Safe Learning" is undefined** in the project's own naming gloss | Students reasonably expect a training loop and find none | §3.5 |
 
 Refreshed 2026-09-14. All six gaps above have since closed (#264 and #265
 through ADR-41 and ADR-40; #267 and #268 on 2026-08-17). The current register:
 
 | # | Gap | Why it matters | Where |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| [#347](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/347) | The **typed-vs-monolithic causal study is unrun**; pilot v8 is registered with collection pending on the session-bound confinement attestation (#589–#591) | It is the headline claim; every 4xx spec exists to make its result defensible | README status, ADR-66 |
-| [#346](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/346) | **No perception-eligible task stratum**: the task-band calibration (v13) records BND-7 failed for the only candidate, 22 of 22 strata | Without an eligible non-oracle task, neither the pilot nor the confirmatory study has an instrument | SPEC 490 |
-| [#519](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/519) | Matched-arm session admission and common evidence (MON-8/MON-12) not complete | Gate on every scored session in both arms | SPEC 420/440 |
-| [#483](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/483)–[#486](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/486) | **External reviews not arranged**: statistical (STA-12), terminology (CLM-12), independent reproduction (RPR-10/11), external benchmark user (BMK-21) | Confirmatory and release gates that no in-house work can satisfy | SPEC 400/410/530/540 |
-| [#562](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/562) | No declared **halt contract** for motion nodes (bound, semantics, receipt); ADR-64 already makes a halt terminal | Required by SPEC 460/480/520 as an outcome, defined nowhere; parked until SPEC 460 ratifies or Phase 6 opens | SPEC 520 supplement |
-| [#566](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/566) | Closed idea-tree entries persist but nothing **retrieves a refuted idea** at the moment of choosing | The failure-side half of "does prior work compound"; parked until an H3 rerun | ADR-41, HAR-7 |
-| [#356](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/356) | **Hardware** entry gates (M1, judge fidelity) are GPU-gated; SO-101 driver is loopback-tested only | Every hardware claim stays `hardware_pending` | SPEC 520 |
+| [#347](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/347) | The **typed-vs-monolithic causal study is unrun**; pilot v8 is registered with collection pending on the session-bound confinement attestation (#589–#591) | It is the headline claim; every 4xx spec exists to make its result defensible | README status, ADR-66 |
+| [#346](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/346) | **No perception-eligible task stratum**: the task-band calibration (v13) records BND-7 failed for the only candidate, 22 of 22 strata | Without an eligible non-oracle task, neither the pilot nor the confirmatory study has an instrument | SPEC 490 |
+| [#519](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/519) | Matched-arm session admission and common evidence (MON-8/MON-12) not complete | Gate on every scored session in both arms | SPEC 420/440 |
+| [#483](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/483)–[#486](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/486) | **External reviews not arranged**: statistical (STA-12), terminology (CLM-12), independent reproduction (RPR-10/11), external benchmark user (BMK-21) | Confirmatory and release gates that no in-house work can satisfy | SPEC 400/410/530/540 |
+| [#562](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/562) | No declared **halt contract** for motion nodes (bound, semantics, receipt); ADR-64 already makes a halt terminal | Required by SPEC 460/480/520 as an outcome, defined nowhere; parked until SPEC 460 ratifies or Phase 6 opens | SPEC 520 supplement |
+| [#566](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/566) | Closed idea-tree entries persist but nothing **retrieves a refuted idea** at the moment of choosing | The failure-side half of "does prior work compound"; parked until an H3 rerun | ADR-41, HAR-7 |
+| [#356](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/356) | **Hardware** entry gates (M1, judge fidelity) are GPU-gated; SO-101 driver is loopback-tested only | Every hardware claim stays `hardware_pending` | SPEC 520 |
 
 Two threads remain owner-facing rather than contributor-facing: the eval's
 **seed set and episode count remain candidate-chosen** (the same self-grading

docs/dora-1.0.1-validation.md

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ lockstep conformance claim. The legacy fixture runs in free-run mode, while
 BRG-1 requires lockstep for acceptance; it also asserts TC-4's hardware
 wall-clock band instead of the specified simulation-rate/liveness rules.
 Per CON-13, those test changes are paused in
-[spec-conflict #497](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/497).
+[spec-conflict #497](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/497).
 
 The remaining throughput work is to resolve the fixture migration, then
 measure cold and warm starts separately with a capture boundary that includes

docs/getting-started.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Install Git and rustup as well as Python >= 3.11, managed exclusively through
 ## 1. Install
 
 ```bash
-git clone https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle && cd aisle
+git clone https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle && cd aisle
 uv sync --extra sim --locked
 ```
 
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ uv run --extra sim --locked python tools/quickstart.py --runtime-prefix "$AISLE_
 This executes graph validation, a public task, bundle validation and reporting.
 The quickstart uses the `sim` extra; CUDA experiments use the manual rollout
 path below. The Linux clone and archive paths passed with verified source
-receipts in [run 34082153283](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/actions/runs/34082153283).
+receipts in [run 34082153283](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/actions/runs/34082153283).
 That evidence does not establish independent reproduction or release readiness.
 
 For manual harness and graph commands, make the verified binary available to

docs/paper/aisle-paper.md

@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ verification.)*
 
 ## Reproducibility
 
-Repository: teleworksai/aisle (for double-blind review, this link and
+Repository: moxin-org/aisle (for double-blind review, this link and
 the git metadata are replaced by an anonymized artifact archive; the
 run dates in committed findings remain there as provenance and are
 deliberately absent from this text). Every campaign: protocol ADR + analyzer tool +

docs/project-quality-roadmap.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Date: 2026-08-31
 Status: ACTIVE planning program
 Umbrella tracker: [#359 — AISLE 10/10 project-quality
-program](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/359)
+program](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/359)
 
 ## Objective
 
@@ -24,21 +24,21 @@ simulation, statistics, safety, integrity, and release work can proceed now.
 
 | Dimension | Starting review | Objective exit gate | Issues |
 |---|---:|---|---|
-| Novelty and potential | 6/10 | Public versioned benchmark, blind evaluation, external user, and a defensible boundary against adjacent systems | [#357](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/357), [#358](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/358) |
-| Technical system quality | 7/10 | Equal-capability control, sealed evaluator, scoped actuation boundary, and adversarial instrument/safety tests | [#344](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/344), [#348](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/348), [#350](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/350), [#353](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/353), [#354](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/354) |
-| Experimental rigor | 3/10 | Session-level estimands, power, replication, randomized blocks, uncertainty/equivalence, no-fault controls, and retained exclusions | [#345](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/345), [#346](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/346), [#347](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/347), [#349](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/349) |
-| Support for central claim | 2/10 | Replicated typed-dataflow versus monolithic causal study, with null/negative results accepted without reframing | [#344](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/344), [#347](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/347) |
-| Physical-AI relevance | 3/10 | Positive non-oracle result plus SO-101 physical validation and a live-fault operation cell | [#346](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/346), [#356](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/356) |
-| Reproducibility | 8/10 intent | Independent-machine reproduction, complete raw archive, one-command analysis, and DOI | [#353](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/353), [#355](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/355) |
-| Clarity and focus | 4/10 | Mechanically checked claim/evidence matrix and one canonical external architecture/status narrative | [#358](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/358) |
+| Novelty and potential | 6/10 | Public versioned benchmark, blind evaluation, external user, and a defensible boundary against adjacent systems | [#357](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/357), [#358](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/358) |
+| Technical system quality | 7/10 | Equal-capability control, sealed evaluator, scoped actuation boundary, and adversarial instrument/safety tests | [#344](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/344), [#348](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/348), [#350](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/350), [#353](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/353), [#354](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/354) |
+| Experimental rigor | 3/10 | Session-level estimands, power, replication, randomized blocks, uncertainty/equivalence, no-fault controls, and retained exclusions | [#345](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/345), [#346](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/346), [#347](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/347), [#349](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/349) |
+| Support for central claim | 2/10 | Replicated typed-dataflow versus monolithic causal study, with null/negative results accepted without reframing | [#344](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/344), [#347](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/347) |
+| Physical-AI relevance | 3/10 | Positive non-oracle result plus SO-101 physical validation and a live-fault operation cell | [#346](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/346), [#356](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/356) |
+| Reproducibility | 8/10 intent | Independent-machine reproduction, complete raw archive, one-command analysis, and DOI | [#353](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/353), [#355](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/355) |
+| Clarity and focus | 4/10 | Mechanically checked claim/evidence matrix and one canonical external architecture/status narrative | [#358](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/358) |
 
 Safety is deliberately cross-cutting rather than hidden inside one score:
 
-- [#350](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/350) defines and attacks the
+- [#350](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/350) defines and attacks the
   agent-to-actuation threat boundary.
-- [#351](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/351) separates topology,
+- [#351](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/351) separates topology,
   kinematic enforcement, and empirical semantic outcomes.
-- [#352](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/352) decides whether AISLE
+- [#352](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/352) decides whether AISLE
   can support an identity-aware semantic authorization claim; otherwise H5 is
   permanently narrowed.
 
@@ -47,41 +47,41 @@ Safety is deliberately cross-cutting rather than hidden inside one score:
 ### Wave 0 — rules before results
 
 - [#345 — session-level statistics and power
-  analysis](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/345)
+  analysis](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/345)
 - [#353 — treatment integrity
-  v3](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/353)
+  v3](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/353)
 - [#354 — independent instrument audit and mutation
-  benchmark](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/354)
+  benchmark](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/354)
 - [#358 — claim-to-evidence matrix and architecture
-  narrative](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/358)
+  narrative](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/358)
 
 Exit: experimental units, claim scopes, treatment identity, audit expectations,
 and analysis decisions are mechanically explicit.
 
 ### Wave 1 — build fair instruments
 
 - [#344 — equal-capability monolithic
-  control](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/344)
+  control](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/344)
 - [#346 — non-oracle reachable task
-  band](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/346)
+  band](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/346)
 - [#348 — sealed hidden fault bank and
-  injector](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/348)
+  injector](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/348)
 - [#350 — actuation threat model and bypass
-  validation](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/350)
+  validation](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/350)
 - [#351 — safety exposure and held-command
-  ablation](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/351)
+  ablation](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/351)
 - [#352 — semantic authorization
-  boundary](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/352)
+  boundary](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/352)
 
 Exit: expert parity, task reachability, blinding, confinement, and safety
 evidence gates pass before confirmatory data collection.
 
 ### Wave 2 — confirmatory campaigns
 
 - [#347 — replicated typed versus monolithic causal
-  study](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/347)
+  study](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/347)
 - [#349 — replicated typed-evidence versus logs-only fault
-  study](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/349)
+  study](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/349)
 
 Exit: analyzer-derived session-level treatment estimates, uncertainty, no-fault
 false-alarm measurements, and all exclusions are retained. A null or negative
@@ -90,11 +90,11 @@ result is a valid exit.
 ### Wave 3 — independent and physical closure
 
 - [#355 — independent-machine reproduction and DOI
-  artifact](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/355)
+  artifact](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/355)
 - [#356 — SO-101 physical benchmark and live-fault
-  operation](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/356)
+  operation](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/356)
 - [#357 — versioned public benchmark and blind evaluation
-  path](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/357)
+  path](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/357)
 
 Exit: an external operator can run and verify the benchmark without the
 original campaign machine, and physical claims rest on retained hardware
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ evidence.
 
 ## Completion
 
-Close [#359](https://github.com/teleworksai/aisle/issues/359) only after every
+Close [#359](https://github.com/moxin-org/aisle/issues/359) only after every
 child issue is complete or explicitly dispositioned with a narrower claim, the
 claim/evidence matrix has no unsupported headline claim, and an independent
 reviewer audits the completed program.