Skip to content

[draft] MD-85: Bridge Architecture Requirements - #85

Open
franck44 wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
issue68/MDMIP-describing-the-bridge-architecture
Open

[draft] MD-85: Bridge Architecture Requirements#85
franck44 wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
issue68/MDMIP-describing-the-bridge-architecture

Conversation

@franck44

@franck44 franck44 commented Jan 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

MD-85

High-level description of the bridge architecture and inner workings.
see #68.

@franck44 franck44 added bridge Draft MD/MIP A new/draft MD/MIP labels Jan 9, 2025
@franck44 franck44 changed the title Issue68/MDMIP-describing-the-bridge-architecture [draft] Issue68/MDMIP-describing-the-bridge-architecture Jan 13, 2025
@franck44 franck44 added the MD Contains an MD label Jan 13, 2025
@apenzk apenzk changed the title [draft] Issue68/MDMIP-describing-the-bridge-architecture [draft] MIP-85: Lock/Mint bridge high-level description + MD-85: Bridge Architecture Requirements Jan 13, 2025
@apenzk
apenzk marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2025 18:54
@apenzk
apenzk self-requested a review as a code owner January 13, 2025 18:54
@apenzk

apenzk commented Jan 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

accidently clicked the button for ready for review

@apenzk apenzk changed the title [draft] MIP-85: Lock/Mint bridge high-level description + MD-85: Bridge Architecture Requirements [draft] MD-85: Bridge Architecture Requirements Mar 25, 2025
@apenzk
apenzk requested a review from l-monninger March 25, 2025 11:44

@apenzk apenzk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

MD-85 list 4 topics that should be addressed when defining a bridge. it is rather compact.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bridge Draft MD/MIP A new/draft MD/MIP MD Contains an MD

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants