Repository navigation
Add DeepSeek Harness support - #36
LeonHibnik wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
zro-inference
left a comment
zro-inference
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adds a DeepSeek Harness (dsh) tool adapter: a new src/engine/tools/dsh.ts that writes an isolated cordis.patch.yml profile patch (Zro provider, default model, and an MCP client entry that pulls the bearer token from process.env.ZRO_API_KEY rather than embedding it), plus catalog/SUPPORTED_TOOLS/run.ts wiring, changelog/README docs, and tests covering the patch contents, gateway override, no-auth mode, and DSH_HOME isolation. The diff is additive and follows the existing adapter shape (mirrors opencode's baseUrl/mcpUrl/noAuth options and env-key indirection), and the secret is correctly kept out of generated files.
Note: all four analysis specialties (correctness, security, test-coverage, adversarial) timed out before producing findings, so this approval is a summary-level pass over the diff rather than the usual deep specialist review. Nothing here should be read as positive confirmation of correctness beyond what is visible in the diff; a follow-up pass is worth running once the specialists can complete.
JenClaude command reference
Reply with @MoonMathJen on this PR to trigger commands:
| Command | Example | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Re-review | @MoonMathJen rereview |
Re-review after changes (full or scoped — see below) |
| Stop | @MoonMathJen stop |
Cancel in-progress review |
| Stop + summarize | @MoonMathJen stop and summarize |
Post partial findings so far |
| Focus specialty | @MoonMathJen only security |
Review only the named specialty |
| Skip specialty | @MoonMathJen skip test-coverage |
Review everything except the named specialty |
| Change model | @MoonMathJen pr-review-model: kimi-k2.7-coder |
Run this review with a specific model |
| Add context | @MoonMathJen focus on auth edge cases |
Free-text guidance passed to reviewers |
Specialties: correctness, security, test-coverage, adversarial
Any text in the comment beyond a recognized command is passed to the reviewers as context. Use it to point them at areas that matter, explain what changed since the last review, or call out constraints (e.g. "skip generated files", "the auth flow is the riskiest part here"). Hard review rules still win over reviewer guidance.
JenClaude metrics: cost $0.000, time 40m 31s, tokens 73,941.
No description provided.