Fix quote attribution contrast - #125
Conversation
Use Aesthetic's existing muted-ink token for the 12px attribution. It measures 4.62:1 on the light paper and 5.70:1 in dark mode, clearing the deterministic WCAG AA blocker without forking the design system. Agent: vanity-parity-implementer Agent-Surface: Codex CLI Agent-Model: openai/gpt-5.4 Agent-Reasoning: high Agent-Task: vanity-migration-canary
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 40 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Allie Verification SummaryStatus: Why: Evidence ran successfully, but review remains: review-needed obligations 11, not-tested obligations 0, WCAG criteria needing review 6. Manifest: Blocking evidence: deterministic failures 0, scripted failures 0, infrastructure failures 0, missing required evidence 0. Review scope — what still needs review, and whyThree counts answer different questions about the same run and will not match, by design:
Not-tested obligations (no verdict recorded this run): 0. Reporters:
Evidence packet: This is evidence visibility for accessibility engineering review, not a legal compliance guarantee. Full evidence packet — screenshot, axe JSON, WCAG drilldown, release projection — is attached as the allie-verify artifact on this run. |
Goal
Clear Vanity's pre-existing deterministic Allie blocker before landing the DigitalOcean Canary parity change.
Change
Use Aesthetic's existing
--ae-ink-mutedtoken for the 12px quote attribution instead of--ae-ink-faint.#737373on#fcfcfc= 4.62:1#8f8f8fon#141414= 5.70:1The separate icon-contrast and pause-control findings remain out of scope.
Proof
./scripts/check.sh— 15/15#q-attr, 2.45:1, run 29061145171 / artifact 8215470534Agent: vanity-parity-implementer
Agent-Surface: Codex CLI
Agent-Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Agent-Task: vanity-migration-canary