Skip to content

Update fp_mojo to 1.0.1 - #413

Open
anatolvitold wants to merge 1 commit into
modular:mainfrom
anatolvitold:update-fp-mojo-1.0.1
Open

anatolvitold wants to merge 1 commit into
modular:mainfrom
anatolvitold:update-fp-mojo-1.0.1

Conversation

@anatolvitold

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates FP Mojo from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1, adding consuming iterator method chains with native standard-library interoperability.

The recipe builds from the published v1.0.1 tag, keeps build number 0 for the new version, and adds iteration_chaining.mojo to the existing package tests. That example covers iterated, flat_map, both list-collection aliases, standard enumerate, and borrowing a source collection.

The build continues to use mojo precompile with mojo-compiler =1.1.0; the runtime pin remains mojo-compiler >=1.1.0,<1.2.0a0.

Validation:

  • Built and tested on linux-64 with rattler-build 0.30.0, both from the working tree and from the published tag using the exact submitted recipe.
  • All four examples passed against the installed package without -I src: quickstart, expression, config_parser and iteration_chaining.
  • Verified the package contains lib/mojo/fp.mojoc, the Apache-2.0 license, and the expected runtime dependency. YAML and whitespace checks passed.
  • linux-aarch64 and osx-arm64 builds are left to upstream CI.

The same-version build-number bump below does not apply because the version changed.

Checklist

  • My recipe.yaml file specifies which version(s) of MAX is compatible with my project (see here for an example). If not, my package is compatible with both 24.5 and 24.6.
  • License file is packaged (see here for an example).
  • Set the build number to 0 (for new packages, or if the version changed).
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged).

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants