Skip to content

Improve inheritance of MultiBody constraints - #4227

Open
tobolar wants to merge 3 commits into
modelica:masterfrom
tobolar:issue3739_inheritanceConstraints
Open

tobolar wants to merge 3 commits into
modelica:masterfrom
tobolar:issue3739_inheritanceConstraints

Conversation

@tobolar

@tobolar tobolar commented Nov 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Refs #3739

The intension is to rearrange PR #4091 in smaller and better evaluable portions in order to implement "selective model extension" approach after that, see also #4091 (comment)

More PRs will follow.

(This PR is generated by cherry-picking and squashing some comments of #4091 - so no new stuff here.)

@tobolar tobolar added enhancement New feature or enhancement L: Mechanics.MultiBody Issue addresses Modelica.Mechanics.MultiBody labels Nov 9, 2023
@tobolar tobolar added this to the MSL4.1.0 milestone Nov 9, 2023
@tobolar tobolar changed the title Improve inheritance of classes in MultiBody constraints Improve inheritance of MultiBody constraints Nov 9, 2023
@HansOlsson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ah, I was a bit confused at first.
This is just normal code refactoring without selective model extension, right?

(But preparing for possibly using it.)

@tobolar

tobolar commented Nov 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This is just normal code refactoring without selective model extension, right?

Exactly! This is a pre-step to #4231 to make some meaningful changes from PR #4091 first (which I've changed to a draft and shall be refused later on). Doing that, this PR can be merged to the new MSL version independently of "selective model extension" progress in #4231.

#4228 is of the same idea.

Sorry for the confusion.

@HansOlsson HansOlsson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok. Will just run the tests as well to confirm.

@HansOlsson
HansOlsson self-requested a review December 1, 2023 10:10

@HansOlsson HansOlsson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, including tests.

@beutlich
beutlich removed their request for review January 12, 2024 21:57
@arunkumar-narasimhan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@MartinOtter , could you please review this PR?

@tobolar

tobolar commented Jan 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@MartinOtter , could you please review this PR?

IMO @beutlich could also do. See his comment #4091 (review) which refers to changes related MBS constraints (which this PR is about). So he is informed as well.

@AHaumer

AHaumer commented Jan 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MartinOtter and @HansOlsson please review and finalize this PR, otherwise agree with @tobolar on shifting the milestone.
Feel free to invite additional reviewers.

@beutlich
beutlich removed their request for review January 24, 2024 21:52
@tobolar
tobolar requested a review from beutlich January 25, 2024 09:58
@tobolar tobolar modified the milestones: MSL4.1.0, MSL4.2.0 Jan 26, 2024
@beutlich
beutlich removed their request for review February 15, 2024 09:24
@beutlich
beutlich force-pushed the issue3739_inheritanceConstraints branch from 5530497 to 38ec62b Compare April 9, 2025 10:25
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@beutlich has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be949b2 and 38ec62b.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • Modelica/Mechanics/MultiBody/Interfaces/PartialConstraint.mo (1 hunks)
  • Modelica/Mechanics/MultiBody/Interfaces/package.order (1 hunks)
  • Modelica/Mechanics/MultiBody/Joints/Constraints/Prismatic.mo (1 hunks)
  • Modelica/Mechanics/MultiBody/Joints/Constraints/Revolute.mo (4 hunks)
  • Modelica/Mechanics/MultiBody/Joints/Constraints/Spherical.mo (3 hunks)
  • Modelica/Mechanics/MultiBody/Joints/Constraints/Universal.mo (1 hunks)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or enhancement L: Mechanics.MultiBody Issue addresses Modelica.Mechanics.MultiBody

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants