Allow repeated IPFIX IEs and safe zero-length NetFlow v9 fields - #299
Merged
mikemiles-dev merged 1 commit intoJul 18, 2026
Conversation
Owner
|
Thanks for the contribution! |
Merged
mikemiles-dev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2026
Bump version to 1.0.5 and document the fix from #299 (accept repeated IPFIX fields and safe zero-length V9 fields).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Motivation
The duplicate-field check rejects valid IPFIX templates that repeat the same Information Element. RFC 7011 explicitly requires collectors to support this pattern.
The v9 zero-length check rejects complete records that are safe to parse because another member consumes input. Rejecting only templates whose total record size is zero preserves the infinite-loop guard without discarding those records.
Tests
cargo testcargo clippy --all -- -D warningscargo test --doc./scripts/check-readme-sync.shRFC reference: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7011.html#section-8