Skip to content

[cudnn-frontend] Update to 1.27.0 - #53411

Draft
SunBlack (SunBlack) wants to merge 1 commit into
microsoft:masterfrom
SunBlack:cudnn-frontend
Draft

[cudnn-frontend] Update to 1.27.0#53411
SunBlack (SunBlack) wants to merge 1 commit into
microsoft:masterfrom
SunBlack:cudnn-frontend

Conversation

@SunBlack

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Changes comply with the maintainer guide.
  • SHA512s are updated for each updated download.
  • The "supports" clause reflects platforms that may be fixed by this new version, or no changes were necessary.
  • Any fixed CI baseline and CI feature baseline entries are removed from that file, or no entries needed to be changed.
  • All patch files in the port are applied and succeed.
  • The version database is fixed by rerunning ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committing the result.
  • Exactly one version is added in each modified versions file.

@BillyONeal Billy O'Neal (BillyONeal) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the update! GPT 5.6 Sol reports:

The port still declares MIT and installs only LICENSE.txt, but 1.27.0 contains both Apache-2.0 and MIT headers. Upstream declares Apache-2.0 AND MIT and provides the applicable LICENSING.md, LICENSE-MIT.txt, and NOTICE. Consequently, the package reports incorrect license metadata and omits required licensing material.

The exported cudnn_frontend CMake target does not discover or propagate its required cuDNN dependency. Consumers following the generated usage fail to link cudnnGetVersion() unless they independently call find_package(CUDNN) and link CuDNN::CuDNN. The target also exposes an absolute CUDA include path from the build environment. The package configuration should resolve and transitively link cuDNN without embedding build-machine paths.

Upstream now includes include/cudnn_frontend/AGENTS.md, which is installed as a public header despite being repository-specific agent instructions rather than consumable package content.

Would you consider SunBlack#43 ?

@BillyONeal
Billy O'Neal (BillyONeal) marked this pull request as draft August 15, 2026 00:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants