Fix path exposure in WebServerInterceptor log

[t-burch]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved resource-not-found error responses by limiting installation path details to development mode.
  • Production error messages no longer expose internal filesystem paths.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f106ce6a-a49c-4d81-910e-9cf7a81f2ea4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cfed5ba and e1f4ea5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• core/src/main/java/com/predic8/membrane/core/interceptor/server/WebServerInterceptor.java
• core/src/test/java/com/predic8/membrane/core/interceptor/server/WebServerInterceptorTest.java

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The error response now stores unresolved paths as internal data. Tests verify that production responses omit installation paths while development responses include the expected path.

Changes

Error path visibility

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Internalize unresolved path and validate environment output core/src/main/java/com/predic8/membrane/core/interceptor/server/WebServerInterceptor.java, core/src/test/java/com/predic8/membrane/core/interceptor/server/WebServerInterceptorTest.java	createResponse attaches the unresolved path through .internal(...). Tests verify path omission in production mode and path inclusion in development mode.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to e1f4e

This is a localized path-logging fix with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining beyond normal checks and review.

Suggested reviewers: rrayst

Poem

A rabbit checks the error trail,
The hidden path stays under veil.
In dev, the path hops into sight,
In prod, it hides from public light.
Tests thump softly: all is right.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 4 functions across 2 files.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title identifies the WebServerInterceptor path-exposure change, but it incorrectly describes the target as a log. The change affects the problem-details error response.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

📝 Generate docstrings 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch web-server-exposes-installation-path

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[membrane-ci-server]

This pull request needs "/ok-to-test" from an authorized committer.