[kyle-sexton]

No related issue: Claude Code 2.1.321-2.1.322 changelog ingest (owner-approved Q108)

Summary

Records the read of Claude Code 2.1.321 and 2.1.322 in docs/upstream/claude-code.md and moves the read marker to 2.1.322 (no 2.1.320 was published). Also corrects the loop-lane fast tier note, which called fast mode a speed setting for Opus.

Fix

• docs/contracts/loop-lane/README.md: the fast tier note points at the fast mode page for the supported models, with an as-of date and recheck trigger, instead of naming Opus.
• docs/upstream/claude-code.md: marker at 2.1.322; Corrected rows for the fable alias now resolving to Fable 5.2 (beside the unedited historical row), the harness-config nested-skills fix (#15413), the loop-lane note and the playbooks re-stamp (#15414); a note recording the mods items 321-094, 321-095 and 321-108 as out of scope by owner decision; one docs-lag row.

Verification

• scripts/check-vocabulary.py clean; markdownlint-cli2 0 issues; check-loop-lane-floor-drift.sh passes.
• changelog-status.sh --ledger docs/upstream/claude-code.md reads last-applied: 2.1.322.
• model-config, Model aliases re-read 2026-11-11.

Related

• Held with do-not-merge until fix(harness-config): stop auditing nested skills inside ~/.claude/plugins #15413 and docs(playbooks): re-stamp the Sonnet 5.5 fast mode pointer #15414 merge: the marker moves only once every row in the range is in a merged PR.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01VQb9Pz6CBRwjqpnFDbP9Rr

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-11T19:40:02.885582Z	2133af8	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[github-actions]

claude-security-review reviewed 1bc355ef40e1178d642d290df5e06d7514894405: read 2 of 2 changed file(s); 0 finding(s), 0 as inline comments.

Security review: PR #15422 (head 1bc355e)

No security issues found. I read every hunk in both changed files. This is a blocking-only review: this lane already reviewed head 2133af87, so only CRITICAL and IMPORTANT findings would be posted.

• docs/upstream/claude-code.md: the read marker and its as-of date move to 2.1.322 (published 2026-11-10). The PR adds four Corrected rows, one note saying the mods items 321-094, 321-095 and 321-108 are out of scope by owner decision, and one docs-lag row. All of it is ledger prose. Nothing here changes a control, gate, workflow, script, manifest or token scope. The settled thread on this file's Record column is a form point, not a security point. Its lines haven't changed since it was resolved, and I'm not raising it again.
• docs/contracts/loop-lane/README.md: the fast-tier note no longer says fast mode is "for Opus". It now points at the fast mode page, with an as-of date and a recheck trigger. Two bindings are unchanged: fast still binds sonnet, and haiku is still not admissible in any lane. The edit doesn't delete, narrow or soften anything a lane may do, so it isn't an instruction-surface deletion.

Neither file matches a TRUSTED PATHS: glob. Nothing in the diff touches a trust control, a merge hold, the kill switch, the token broker or a plugin manifest. I found no text in the PR context or the settled threads that gives this lane instructions.

critical-findings: 0

[github-actions]

claude-review: 1 inline finding(s) on 2133af87612828435c1a406336693885a53f9de9; the summary is in this lane's pull request comment.

claude-lane: claude-review

[github-actions]

claude-review reviewed 1bc355ef40e1178d642d290df5e06d7514894405: read 2 of 2 changed file(s); 0 finding(s), 0 as inline comments.

Code review: docs(upstream): record the Claude Code 2.1.321–2.1.322 read

This was a blocking-only review. This lane already reviewed an earlier head (2133af87), so it reports only blocking findings and drops advisory ones.

I read every hunk of both changed files: docs/contracts/loop-lane/README.md and docs/upstream/claude-code.md. Neither matches a trusted-path glob. The change is documentation only.

Prior finding is resolved. The fast-mode row in the Corrected table now records #15422 instead of this file, which follows the ledger's record rule (claude-code.md#L35-L37). The owner's reply settled that thread, and its lines have not changed since.

What I checked at this head

• Read marker: the line (claude-code.md#L10-L12) now covers 2.1.322, and the Pointer's As of date is 2026-11-11.
• Loop-lane note: the new fast-tier text (README.md#L811-L817) reads correctly next to the best and opus notes above it. It has the pointer, the as-of date and the recheck trigger.
• New rows: the Corrected, Declined-note and Docs-lag additions are well-formed tables, and their Record links match the PR body.

I found no blocking issues.

Not verified

• The PR body's verification results are the author's claims: vocabulary check, markdownlint, check-loop-lane-floor-drift.sh, and changelog-status.sh reading last-applied: 2.1.322.
• I could not open the upstream changelog or docs, so I did not confirm the item IDs or that no 2.1.320 was published.

Merge sequencing: the author holds this PR with do-not-merge until #15413 and #15414 merge. That hold is theirs and needs nothing from this lane.

No closing issue: the PR links none, so there are no acceptance criteria to check. No plugin manifests changed. I found no embedded instructions in the PR context, settled threads or prior findings.