Skip to content

fix(dev): machine-recognize review-claim and author_decision states (#7508) #7519

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
ll7 merged 1 commit into from
Aug 18, 2026
Merged

fix(dev): machine-recognize review-claim and author_decision states (#7508) #7519

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions CHANGELOG.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -422,6 +422,21 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
shared resource budget (API quota, runner starvation, tmpfs worktrees). Terminal
states are now part of the output contract. Docs-only; no runtime behavior changed.

* **issue #7508 `pr_loop_policy` machine-recognizes the review-claim and
author-decision markers.** The policy classifier now parks a PR as
`active_writer` when a trusted (OWNER/MEMBER/COLLABORATOR) comment carries an
unexpired, unreleased `review-claim: <lane> @ <head> until <UTC>` marker bound
to the live head, and as `author_decision` when the `decision-required` label
is paired with a live-head `### Decision packet` comment — both distinct from
the generic `blocked_preflight` state and both recommended `no_action` /
`stop`. `review-claim: released @ <head>`, expiry (`now >= until`), and head
movement clear a claim. The marker helpers take an explicit `now` instant for
deterministic testing and the CLI defaults to the current UTC time. The
not-ready-sentinel half (merge-ready present while the body carries a
not-ready sentence) remains tracked in issue #7491 and is intentionally not
implemented here. Workflow/tooling only; no benchmark, planner, or evidence
claim.

* **Issue #7086 representative-run rule de-duplicated into one shared utility.** The rule that
decides which seed stands in for a whole campaign cell — majority-verdict pool, weaker-label
tie-break, median primary order parameter, lower seed on an exact tie — was implemented twice,
Expand Down
Loading
Loading