Skip to content

Update link for correct DV versions in rerun-stripping.md - #329

Merged
AndyLHCb merged 1 commit into
lhcb:masterfrom
mick-mulder:patch-1
Jan 23, 2026
Merged

Update link for correct DV versions in rerun-stripping.md#329
AndyLHCb merged 1 commit into
lhcb:masterfrom
mick-mulder:patch-1

Conversation

@mick-mulder

@mick-mulder mick-mulder commented Nov 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

As figured out by @jpwgnr and @chrisburr, the previous link to processing passes was technically correct in that it refers to the DV version used for each stripping campaign. However, to currently rerun a stripping (e.g. in AnalysisProductions), the patched DV version should be used, as updated in the LbMCSubmit repository.

@mick-mulder
mick-mulder marked this pull request as ready for review November 20, 2025 09:40
@jpwgnr

jpwgnr commented Nov 20, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

as discussed probably there is a cleaner solution as LbMCSubmit changes various things from stage0 to stage6 on the fly and this may not be the full truth in this file, but at least this is an improvement for now until we find a better way.

Just brainstorming, but one could add a test at https://gitlab.cern.ch/lhcb-simulation/lbmcsubmit/-/tree/main/tests/references so one could have a sim10/sim09 which runs on every stripping version available so one could point directly to a stage6 that includes the current versions. Then one could add some curl+grep command to output immediately what an analyst is looking for.

but maybe this is also overkill.

@mick-mulder mick-mulder changed the title Draft: Update link for correct DV versions in rerun-stripping.md Update link for correct DV versions in rerun-stripping.md Nov 21, 2025
@jpwgnr

jpwgnr commented Dec 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ping @AndyLHCb

@AndyLHCb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ah sorry @jpwgnr ! I got this PR confused with #328. This one is fine – merging now

@AndyLHCb
AndyLHCb merged commit 6b6b5e5 into lhcb:master Jan 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants