📝 CodeRabbit Chat: Implement requested code changes

[coderabbitai]

Code changes was requested by @leynos.

• Pin setup-uv references and stabilise action tests #272 (comment)

The following files were modified:

• tests/workflows/conftest.py

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

• Introduce a reusable helper to check for Docker CLI and daemon availability in workflow-related tests.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

This PR was authored by the user configured for CodeRabbit reviews. CodeRabbit does not review PRs authored by this user. It's recommended to use a dedicated user account to post CodeRabbit review feedback.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 7b3f0bcb-7e3c-404e-847b-a80ffcedda13

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Refactors Docker runtime detection in the act runtime probe by extracting the Docker CLI/daemon availability check into a dedicated helper and leaves a slightly modified podman-unavailable return block.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Extract Docker CLI/daemon availability logic into a reusable helper used by the act runtime probe.	Introduce a _docker_daemon_available() helper that checks for the Docker CLI and validates connectivity via docker info and docker ps -a. Replace the inline Docker availability condition in _probe_act_runtime with a call to _docker_daemon_available() for clearer intent and reuse. Adjust the podman-unavailable return block formatting in _probe_act_runtime, keeping the semantics of the returned ActRuntimeStatus the same.	tests/workflows/conftest.py

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

• In the if not shutil.which("podman"): branch the return ActRuntimeStatus( line appears to have been accidentally removed, leaving the block starting with available= and causing invalid syntax—restore the return ActRuntimeStatus( wrapper around those keyword arguments.

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- In the `if not shutil.which("podman"):` branch the `return ActRuntimeStatus(` line appears to have been accidentally removed, leaving the block starting with `available=` and causing invalid syntax—restore the `return ActRuntimeStatus(` wrapper around those keyword arguments.

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}