Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 13, 2026. It is now read-only.

Update Process Model Search to Allow Relative Imports - #903

Open
kds300 wants to merge 5 commits into
lava-nc:mainfrom
kds300:proc-model-search
Open

Update Process Model Search to Allow Relative Imports#903
kds300 wants to merge 5 commits into
lava-nc:mainfrom
kds300:proc-model-search

Conversation

@kds300

@kds300 kds300 commented Dec 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue Number: #902

Objective of pull request: Modify process model search process to allow for relative imports when defining custom processes and process models.

Pull request checklist

Your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Issue created that explains the change and why it's needed
  • Tests are part of the PR (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)
  • PR conforms to Coding Conventions
  • PR applys BSD 3-clause or LGPL2.1+ Licenses to all code files
  • Lint (flakeheaven lint src/lava tests/) and (bandit -r src/lava/.) pass locally
    • Changed code does not raise issues.
  • Build tests (pytest) passes locally

Pull request type

Please check your PR type:

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation changes
  • Other (please describe):

What is the current behavior?

  • Relative imports break process model search.

What is the new behavior?

  • Relative imports can now be used in defining process models.

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

… relative imports

Signed-off-by: kevin <kds300@psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: kevin <kds300@psu.edu>
… skipped

Signed-off-by: kevin <kds300@psu.edu>
Signed-off-by: kevin <kds300@psu.edu>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant