Skip to content

Update to recent bundler - #107

Open
tim-vandecasteele wants to merge 1 commit into
larsch:masterfrom
tim-vandecasteele:better-gemfile-support
Open

Update to recent bundler#107
tim-vandecasteele wants to merge 1 commit into
larsch:masterfrom
tim-vandecasteele:better-gemfile-support

Conversation

@tim-vandecasteele

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest bundler doesn't reload the environment when load.specs is called (it's memoized), so the gemfile option is not respected.

Update to recent bundler, and make it possible to use the same gemfile for the complete project and the specific ocra executable.

You can now refer to a gemfile that is structured with groups and only include the gems that are relevant (in the below case ‘tiny_tds’)

source 'https://rubygems.org'
group :development do
gem 'pry'
gem ‘ocra’
end
gem 'tiny_tds'

I also changed that including the gemfile would not check the loaded gems, as in my usecase this would include additional gems I don't use in the executable (for example ocra itself).

…e for the complete project and the specific ocra executable.

You can now refer to a gemfile that is structured with groups and only include the gems that are relevant (in the below case ‘tiny_tds’)

source 'https://rubygems.org'
group :development do
  gem 'pry'
  gem ‘ocra’
end
gem 'tiny_tds'
@larsch

larsch commented Nov 22, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thanks for the submission, but I have tried with Bundler 1.10.6 and Ruby 2.2.3p173 and can't reproduce any issue. Can you provide more details and a test-case or example that doesn't work?

@larsch
larsch force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from b897a6e to 2e7c88f Compare December 1, 2015 12:23
@tim-vandecasteele

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I'm using bundler 1.11.2, but ruby 2.1.7.

I'll try to make a test project to show the behaviour.

Do you think the "groups" are a good idea? (group :development do)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants