Skip to content

feat: add OpenWiki retrieval tools - #525

Closed
Brace Sproul (bracesproul) wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/openwiki-retrieval-tools
Closed

feat: add OpenWiki retrieval tools#525
Brace Sproul (bracesproul) wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/openwiki-retrieval-tools

Conversation

@bracesproul

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changed

  • Adds the OpenWiki retrieval MCP server and package binary.
  • Implements repository indexing, keyword/semantic ranking, change-surface retrieval, and focused search.
  • Adds retrieval-focused tests.

Why

Give coding agents concise, source-grounded repository evidence without requiring broad exploratory scans.

Validation

  • 10 retrieval tests
  • Typecheck
  • Formatting

@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 34d31b1

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

}
const info = await stat(resolved);
if (info.size > MAX_FILE_BYTES) return "";
const content = await readFile(resolved, "utf8");
@bracesproul
Brace Sproul (bracesproul) force-pushed the codex/openwiki-retrieval-tools branch from a9eb264 to 34d31b1 Compare July 30, 2026 00:52
@bracesproul

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Superseded by #528 (generic prompt changes against main) and #529 (retrieval tools stacked on #528).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants