Skip to content

interval: run search on reified goals - #9213

Merged
kim-em merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
agent/interval-dynamic-goal
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

interval: run search on reified goals#9213
kim-em merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
agent/interval-dynamic-goal

Conversation

@kim-em

@kim-em kim-em commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • remove the fixed two-node exponential search fixture from the modeled-goal tactic
  • start PolicySession from the actual reified CheckerInput
  • select the exponential rule at the actual target node, quote that session, and replay it through the generic proof frontend with the dynamic program and caller facts
  • cover both a graph extended by an unrelated supported hypothesis and the distinct three-node target exp (exp x) with ordinary theorem canaries
  • keep model construction, scheduling, quotation, and replay free of graph-shape cases
  • document the current resource mismatch honestly: goal reification permits 16 nodes/depth 8, while the ExpSign session currently permits 5 nodes/depth 4

Validation

  • focused HexIntervalMathlib.ExpSignConformance build (1,958 jobs)
  • copyright, line-count, DAG, trust-surface, Phase 4, factor-freshness, and diff checks
  • fresh isolated exact-head review: approve, no blockers
  • exact-head CI required before merge

No native_decide, axioms, or sorries are introduced.

@kim-em
kim-em force-pushed the agent/interval-goal-closure branch from 32b169b to 7c5c145 Compare August 11, 2026 19:35
@kim-em
kim-em force-pushed the agent/interval-dynamic-goal branch from e2e0cf1 to f59ce8a Compare August 11, 2026 19:36
@kim-em
kim-em force-pushed the agent/interval-dynamic-goal branch from f59ce8a to 8e157a9 Compare August 12, 2026 04:37
@kim-em
kim-em changed the base branch from agent/interval-goal-closure to main August 12, 2026 04:37
@kim-em
kim-em marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2026 05:00
@kim-em
kim-em merged commit 9dcefd0 into main Aug 12, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant