When using a test case that replicates the final example (Bouchon's article, Fig 6), an issue was identified: the waveform duration generated by grmot is 10 seconds, whereas the reference literature specifies 6.3 seconds. Even after truncating the first 1.7 seconds (the pre-P wave arrival time), the remaining duration is still 8.3 seconds. so the errors is the 8.3s waveform result from this code is the same as 6.3s waveform of Bouchon's article.
Notably, the waveform morphology matches the reference, but the time axis appears to be scaled incorrectly. This suggests the code's output has a proportional time elongation issue, where the temporal scale is amplified by a constant factor relative to the literature. The discrepancy is not in waveform shape but in the temporal scaling, maybe there's something wrong in slip-rate function
When using a test case that replicates the final example (Bouchon's article, Fig 6), an issue was identified: the waveform duration generated by grmot is 10 seconds, whereas the reference literature specifies 6.3 seconds. Even after truncating the first 1.7 seconds (the pre-P wave arrival time), the remaining duration is still 8.3 seconds. so the errors is the 8.3s waveform result from this code is the same as 6.3s waveform of Bouchon's article.
Notably, the waveform morphology matches the reference, but the time axis appears to be scaled incorrectly. This suggests the code's output has a proportional time elongation issue, where the temporal scale is amplified by a constant factor relative to the literature. The discrepancy is not in waveform shape but in the temporal scaling, maybe there's something wrong in slip-rate function