Skip to content

Enhancement#424 sparql result mapping implicit type#436

Merged
ledsoft merged 2 commits into
developmentfrom
enhancement#424-sparql-result-mapping-implicit-type
May 4, 2026
Merged

Enhancement#424 sparql result mapping implicit type#436
ledsoft merged 2 commits into
developmentfrom
enhancement#424-sparql-result-mapping-implicit-type

Conversation

@ledsoft

@ledsoft ledsoft commented May 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Resolves #424.

@ledsoft ledsoft linked an issue May 4, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@ledsoft ledsoft merged commit 1936ef8 into development May 4, 2026
1 check passed
@ledsoft ledsoft deleted the enhancement#424-sparql-result-mapping-implicit-type branch May 4, 2026 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SPARQL result mapping should not require explicit types projection

1 participant