Skip to content

Repair three stale handoff statements and prune two resolved entries - #164

Merged
kaikisegfault merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/164-handoff-consistency
Aug 15, 2026
Merged

Repair three stale handoff statements and prune two resolved entries#164
kaikisegfault merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/164-handoff-consistency

Conversation

@kaikisegfault

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Documentation only. Consistency sweep after four ADRs landed in one day, so a
fresh session reads nothing that contradicts the current state.

Three stale statements in current-state.md:

  • the phase summary still said one founder-reserved question blocked the next
    slice — all are closed, and it now names ADR 0040, 0041, and 0042;
  • the repository-state entry still said M3.9d moves the C++ codec — the slice
    was withdrawn and the codec stays at version four;
  • the M3.9c gate record still read as though the recovery consequence it flagged
    were pending. It is not, and the record now says the owner rejected all three
    offered flows and directed the pivot instead.

Two already-resolved entries in the constitution's unresolved list, both
settled on 2026-08-14 and already recorded as resolved in the paragraph below
it: whether seat purchase requires HUB verification first, and whether an
identity's address set lives in consensus state. Both are doubly moot now.

Verification

Focused metadata path. 5 repository skills and 176 internal Markdown links
validated; tests/tools passes 14 tests.

…ntries

A consistency sweep of the handoff after four ADRs landed in one day.

The phase summary still said one founder-reserved question blocked the next
slice; all of them are closed, and it now names the three ADRs that closed them.
The repository-state entry still said M3.9d moves the C++ codec; the slice was
withdrawn, and the codec stays at version four because the direction supersedes
version five as its target.

The M3.9c gate record still read as though the recovery consequence it flagged
were pending. It is not: the owner rejected all three offered flows and directed
the pivot instead, so a recovering person regains escrows that already hold
value and a brand-new one is funded by the entry airdrop. The record now says
so, and notes that this is the second time the standing invitation of 2026-08-13
produced a better design than inference would have.

The constitution's unresolved list still carried two items resolved on
2026-08-14 — whether seat purchase requires HUB verification first, and whether
an identity's address set lives in consensus state. Both were already recorded
as resolved in the paragraph below the list, and both are doubly moot now that
verification is mandatory and an identity holds escrows directly.
@kaikisegfault
kaikisegfault merged commit 5738251 into main Aug 15, 2026
3 checks passed
@kaikisegfault
kaikisegfault deleted the docs/164-handoff-consistency branch August 15, 2026 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant