🧹 Refactor _register_tools to fix long function code smell - #61
Conversation
Co-authored-by: joy7758 <138868899+joy7758@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Co-authored-by: joy7758 <138868899+joy7758@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: joy7758 <138868899+joy7758@users.noreply.github.com>
🎯 What: Extracted the monolithic
_register_toolsmethod into three smaller, logical groupings (_register_core_tools,_register_cloud_tools,_register_evaluation_tools). The original_register_toolsmethod now delegates to these three new helpers.💡 Why:
_register_toolswas 272 lines long, containing many nested definitions. Splitting it improves readability and maintainability without altering functionality.✅ Verification: Ran
ruff formatandruff checkon the file to ensure stylistic correctness. Executed the full unit test suite, confirming no regressions. Verified the customvalidate_governance.pyandvalidate_milestone.pyscript checks.✨ Result: The
runtime_mcp_server.pycodebase is cleaner and adheres to better software engineering practices regarding function length.PR created automatically by Jules for task 13167887666024849926 started by @joy7758