Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Paper: Comparison of Controlled Undersampling Methods for Machine Learning

Experiment Results

Performance metrics are presented in the two tables. Results for small datasets are shown in Table Model Evaluation Results on Small Datasets, whereas the results for the larger datasets can be found in Table Model Evaluation Results on Large Datasets. These tables have the following structure. F1 scores with standard deviation for each dataset are shown based on the reduction ratio for the tested model and the sampling method. The reduction ratio indicates the amount of data that is removed from the original dataset. The ratio of 0.0 indicates no reduction, while the ratio of 0.9 means that 90% of the data was removed. The final column displays the mean F1 score across all reduction ratios, excluding 0.0. The bold values highlight the optimal method for the given dataset and model.

Table with results for small datasets

Averaged Boxplot

Table with results for large datasets

Averaged Times

Visualization of all datasets (Reduction phase line graphs and Deviation boxplots)

Banana dataset

Averaged Banana Averaged Banana Boxplot 0.5

Buba dataset

Averaged Bupa Averaged Bupa Boxplot 0.5

KDD CUP dataset

Averaged KDD Cup Averaged KDD Cup Boxplot 0.5

Magic dataset

Averaged Magic Averaged Magic Boxplot 0.5

Monk-2 dataset

Averaged Monk-2 Averaged Monk-2 Boxplot 0.5

Phoneme dataset

Averaged Phoneme Averaged Phoneme Boxplot 0.5

Pima dataset

Averaged Pima Averaged Pima Boxplot 0.5

Ring dataset

Averaged Ring Averaged Ring Boxplot 0.5

Overall results (Overall F1 score and time consumption)

Averaged Boxplot Averaged Times

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors