Align sitewide research narrative - #9
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
The Research page now uses a question-and-finding structure, while the rest of the site still reflected an older method-centered organization. This update gives visitors one coherent source-to-receptor story across the site.
Impact
Readers can move from a concise homepage overview to four substantiated research studies, selected publications, and a CV that use the same scientific framing.
Validation
The Open Graph image remains unset intentionally: the existing research figure is not a purpose-built social-preview graphic, and the social-card design remains deferred.