test: report Rozenite E2E case values

[jingjing2222]

Summary

• print every Rozenite E2E case with its input, expected value, actual value, and pass/fail status
• split the behavior coverage into explicit host, panel, bundle, position, distance-filter, max-updates, and cleanup cases
• include the same 10-case result table in the GitHub Actions Job Summary
• preserve failed browser-case expected/actual values in Electron output

Validation

• yarn test:e2e:rozenite — 10/10 cases passed
• biome check scripts/test-rozenite-e2e.mjs scripts/rozenite-e2e-electron.cjs
• node --check scripts/test-rozenite-e2e.mjs
• node --check scripts/rozenite-e2e-electron.cjs
• git diff --check

The manual /e2e workflow was not triggered from this PR to avoid unnecessarily occupying both self-hosted mobile runners.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 52db38c

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-08-31T01:03:22.053291Z	52db38c	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 52db38c591

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Write the summary even when a case fails

When any host, panel, bundle, or Electron behavior assertion fails, control jumps directly to finally, so this call is never reached and the GitHub Actions job summary contains no case table precisely when the expected/actual diagnostics are most useful. The failure path should retain the failed case and emit the accumulated summary before propagating the error.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.