docs: registra flujo de coautoría revisable - #138
Merged
Conversation
Concepto: la coautoría requiere atribución y revisión humana comprobable. Problema: la guía no describía el flujo validado por el PR #136. Alternativas: dejar la práctica implícita o documentar los pasos verificables. Justificación: registrar autor, coautor, asignación, revisión y squash merge evita automatizar la aprobación. Co-authored-by: Joel Alvarez D. <124008575+joelalvarezduenas@users.noreply.github.com>
jeresoftx
added
documentation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #137
Registra el flujo validado por el PR #136: autor principal, trailer de coautoría, PR asignado a jeresoftx, revisión humana de la identidad coautora y squash merge posterior a la aprobación.
Verificaciones: compuertas documentales, formato, clippy, pruebas, doctests y benchmarks en verde.