Add evidence-integrity reporting, archives, and comparisons - #4
Draft
jeremie5 wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
sample_kindevidence so calibration rows cannot be mistaken for airflow-run evidence.SessionReportV1output.Why
The existing data UI exposed useful traces but did not provide an immutable report artifact, a durable verified evidence bundle, or safe cross-session comparison semantics. Calibration and therapy samples were also indistinguishable in retained CSV, and ordinary graph downsampling could hide short low-flow changes or singleton optional samples.
This change establishes provenance and evidence-integrity contracts before adding broader longitudinal analytics. It deliberately remains experimental and non-diagnostic.
Impact
Builders can save and export byte-verifiable captures, understand exactly which evidence was analyzed, and compare compatible saved captures without evaluative or clinical language. Invalid, sparse, truncated, mixed-source, or incompatible evidence fails closed or has its deltas suppressed.
Archive owner fingerprints remain linkable, unkeyed pseudonyms rather than authentication or strong identity privacy, and the documentation states that limitation explicitly.
Validation
node scripts/verify-local.mjsesp32devandesp32dev_bench_pwmbuilds