Skip to content

Improve reference selection for failed builds - #3283

Open
akash-manna-sky wants to merge 5 commits into
jenkinsci:mainfrom
akash-manna-sky:JENKINS-61140
Open

Improve reference selection for failed builds#3283
akash-manna-sky wants to merge 5 commits into
jenkinsci:mainfrom
akash-manna-sky:JENKINS-61140

Conversation

@akash-manna-sky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Improve reference selection for failed builds

Fixes #2945

Testing done

Submitter checklist

  • Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
  • Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
  • Please describe what you did
  • Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
  • Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
  • Ensure you have provided tests that demonstrate the feature works or the issue is fixed

@akash-manna-sky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Could you please let me know what kind of improvements you are expecting? I will implement them accordingly. @uhafner

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

☀️   Quality Monitor

Tests

   JUnit   Unit Tests: ✅ successful — 92 passed $\textsf{(±0)}$, 2 skipped $\textsf{(±0)}$
   🚀   Integration Tests: ❌ unstable — 2 failed $\color{red}{\textsf{(+2)}}$, 507 passed $\color{red}{\textsf{(-1)}}$, 10 skipped $\textsf{(±0)}$
   ⛔   Architecture Tests: ✅ successful — 15 passed $\textsf{(±0)}$

Coverage for New Code

   〰️   Line Coverage: 83.33% — 6 missed lines
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 64.29% — 10 missed branches

Coverage for Whole Project

   〰️   Line Coverage: 80.86% $\color{red}{\textsf{(-0.01)}}$ — 1192 missed lines
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 65.14% $\color{red}{\textsf{(-0.11)}}$ — 479 missed branches

Style

   CheckStyle   CheckStyle: 1 warning $\color{green}{\textsf{(+1)}}$ — normal: 1
   PMD   PMD: 3 warnings $\color{green}{\textsf{(+3)}}$ — normal: 3
   ☕   Java Compiler: 17 warnings $\color{green}{\textsf{(+1)}}$ — normal: 17

Bugs

   SpotBugs   SpotBugs: No bugs $\textsf{(±0)}$
   🐛   Error Prone: No bugs $\textsf{(±0)}$

Vulnerabilities

   🛡️   OWASP Dependency Check: 281 vulnerabilities $\color{green}{\textsf{(+281)}}$ — error: 28, high: 85, normal: 157, low: 11

Software Metrics

   🌀   Cyclomatic Complexity: 2643 (total)
   💭   Cognitive Complexity: 864 (total)
   ➿   N-Path Complexity: 3014 (total)
   📏   Lines of Code: 32201 (total)
   📝   Non Commenting Source Statements: 10705 (total)
   🔗   Class Cohesion: 100.00% (maximum)
   ⚖️   Weight of Class: 100.00% (maximum)

📌 Reference Results

Delta reports computed against the reference results of c0c8031 in workflow run 27405111244.

🚦 Quality Gates

Overall Status: ❌ FAILURE

✅ Passed Gates

  • ✅ Potential Bugs in Whole Project: 0.00 <= 0.00

❌ Failed Gates

  • ❌ Overall Tests Success Rate: 99.68 >= 100.00
  • ❌ Line Coverage in New Code: 83.33 >= 90.00
  • ❌ Branch Coverage in New Code: 64.29 >= 90.00
  • ❌ Style Violation in Whole Project: 21.00 <= 0.00

Created by Quality Monitor v4.15.0 (#82d77af). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

@uhafner uhafner added the bug Bugs or performance problems label Jul 24, 2026
@akash-manna-sky
akash-manna-sky marked this pull request as ready for review August 10, 2026 18:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Bugs or performance problems

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[JENKINS-61140] Improve reference selection for failed builds

3 participants