Skip to content

Consumer should use inner value if already existing - #79

Merged
AndreasIgel merged 10 commits into
mainfrom
feature/consumer-with-inner-value
Oct 19, 2025
Merged

AndreasIgel merged 10 commits into
mainfrom
feature/consumer-with-inner-value

Conversation

@AndreasIgel

@AndreasIgel AndreasIgel commented Oct 19, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 19, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 1 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

Snapshot Warnings

⚠️: No snapshots were found for the head SHA 13fb306.
Ensure that dependencies are being submitted on PR branches and consider enabling retry-on-snapshot-warnings. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice.

License Issues

core/pom.xml

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin0.8.14NullUnknown License

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
maven/org.jacoco:jacoco-maven-plugin 0.8.14 🟢 6
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 9Found 21/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 10all dependencies are pinned
License🟢 9license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ 0Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Branch-Protection🟢 8branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
maven/org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api 5.11.4 🟢 8.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review⚠️ 2Found 5/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dependency-Update-Tool🟢 10update tool detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
Binary-Artifacts🟢 9binaries present in source code
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 10all dependencies are pinned
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
CII-Best-Practices🟢 5badge detected: Passing
SAST🟢 10SAST tool is run on all commits
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
License🟢 10license file detected
CI-Tests🟢 1015 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Contributors🟢 10project has 60 contributing companies or organizations
maven/org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine 5.11.4 🟢 8.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review⚠️ 2Found 5/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 22 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dependency-Update-Tool🟢 10update tool detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
Binary-Artifacts🟢 9binaries present in source code
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 10all dependencies are pinned
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
CII-Best-Practices🟢 5badge detected: Passing
SAST🟢 10SAST tool is run on all commits
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
License🟢 10license file detected
CI-Tests🟢 1015 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Contributors🟢 10project has 60 contributing companies or organizations

Scanned Files

  • core/pom.xml

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@AndreasIgel
AndreasIgel merged commit 6befd30 into main Oct 19, 2025
8 checks passed
@AndreasIgel
AndreasIgel deleted the feature/consumer-with-inner-value branch October 19, 2025 21:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consumer should use inner value if already existing

1 participant