Add tests for clojure.core/every?

[brandoncorrea]

This PR closes #261

Edit

This PR also closes #375, not-every?

[brandoncorrea]

I noticed not-every #375 is open as well, which is just (not (every? ...)).

Is the expectation for (not (foo ...)) functions that we create the foo tests in foo.cljc and reference them in both foo and not-foo tests? I see that being done with = and not=.

• https://github.com/jank-lang/clojure-test-suite/blob/main/test/clojure/core_test/not_eq.cljc
• https://github.com/jank-lang/clojure-test-suite/blob/main/test/clojure/core_test/eq.cljc

If so, it wouldn't be much more work to include that as part of this PR.

[jeaye]

I noticed not-every #375 is open as well, which is just (not (every? ...)).

Is the expectation for (not (foo ...)) functions that we create the foo tests in foo.cljc and reference them in both foo and not-foo tests? I see that being done with = and not=.

* https://github.com/jank-lang/clojure-test-suite/blob/main/test/clojure/core_test/not_eq.cljc

* https://github.com/jank-lang/clojure-test-suite/blob/main/test/clojure/core_test/eq.cljc

If so, it wouldn't be much more work to include that as part of this PR.

Sure, I think this is ok. No need to duplicate everything.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Adds a new cross-dialect test namespace covering clojure.core/every?, addressing the missing coverage tracked in issue #261.

Changes:

• Introduces clojure.core-test.every-qmark with core behavioral tests for every?.
• Adds coverage for empty/nil collections, predicate-as-collection/map behavior, short-circuiting, infinite sequences, and invalid-argument shapes.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[jeaye]

These look great to me!

[E-A-Griffin]

Ignore my initial comment, I checked again and I see you already have it covered