add(analysis-001): cosine power–cosine Fourier integral#10
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughTwo new Typst documents are added for problem ChangesCosine Power–Cosine Fourier Integral problem solution
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@problems/analysis-001-cos-power-cos-integral-th.typ`:
- Around line 246-247: The induction claim at lines 246-247 states the identity
holds for all β in ℝ, but the subsequent proof divides by β and by n²-β², and
Proof II requires s=(β-n)/2>0, which means β>n. Replace the domain "สำหรับทุก
$gamma in RR$" (for all gamma in ℝ) with a restricted domain statement such as
"สำหรับทุก $gamma > n$" to match the actual derivation constraints.
Alternatively, if the identity should hold on the full real line, add a separate
continuity or limit argument that extends the result from the restricted domain
β>n to the excluded values where division is undefined or the constraint is
violated.
In `@problems/analysis-001-cos-power-cos-integral.typ`:
- Around line 256-257: The inductive hypothesis statement around line 256-257
claims validity for all real β, but the proof contains divisions by β and n±β,
and applies formulas with domain restrictions like s=(β-n)/2>0. Revise the
statement of the inductive hypothesis to specify that I(n-1, β) = F(n-1, β) only
for β in the valid domain (β > α > -1) as stated in the theorem, rather than
claiming it holds for all real β. Alternatively, explicitly separate and handle
the singular or boundary cases where these divisions are undefined or the
formulas do not apply. Apply this same correction to the analogous statements
around lines 393-395.
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 41-43: The problem table in README.md has duplicate index numbers
in the # column, with both the "Cosine Power–Cosine Fourier Integral" entry and
the "A Nested Floor–Ceiling Integral" entry labeled as 001. Update the second
entry (A Nested Floor–Ceiling Integral) to have a unique index number of 002 to
ensure each problem has a distinct, sequential identifier in the # column.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 4b2ab967-2a03-4844-bb20-89b2da9ec9ba
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
README.mdproblems/analysis-001-cos-power-cos-integral-th.typproblems/analysis-001-cos-power-cos-integral.typ
15a9d2f to
3b1d837
Compare
What & why
Adds the cosine power–cosine Fourier integral as the first
analysisproblem.The result — a closed form via Gamma functions — is a classical identity that
warrants two independent proofs at different levels of machinery.
Closes #9
Checklist
typst compile --root . problems/analysis-001-cos-power-cos-integral.typ— cleanbash scripts/build-index.sh— 2 problemscite(...)— no red[ref?]markersBilingual
analysis-001-cos-power-cos-integral-th.typ— both compileNotes
Two proofs, one
= Proofssection with==subsections (new convention for multi-proof problems, documented inwrite-proofskill):Unit circle diagram included for Proof II showing the$w = e^{-2ix}$ contour path.
Recommended review order: Problem Statement → Proof I → Proof II → Verification.
Summary by CodeRabbit