Repository navigation
[deployment_manager] Remove deployment_manager - #1813
Open
BenjaminPelletier wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
BenjaminPelletier wants to merge 1 commit into
BenjaminPelletier wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
BenjaminPelletier
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 15, 2026 23:07
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
All content retained in the repository presents an ongoing maintenance burden whose cost should be periodically judged against the value of that content. Prompted by #1803, I looked at deployment_manager and believe it is obsolete and should be removed -- this PR proposes that removal. The original intent of this tool was to reduce the complexity of some of the operational tasks expected of a DSS operator. However, it was never adopted as a useful approach to solve this problem, and the actual tasks it is currently capable of performing are mostly unnecessary with the addition of the certificate-related aux endpoints added to the InterUSS DSS implementation.
Merging this PR is not urgent and I would appreciate DSS contributors (e.g., @MariemBaccari, @the-glu, @barroco) confirming they don't expect to want to use or rely on this tool before merging.
This PR, if merged, makes #1803 unnecessary as it removes that dependency.