fix(ait): persist sandbox storage across reloads#108
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 52 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAIT sandbox storage now supports configurable, namespaced browser persistence, with JSON serialization, corruption handling, and automatic fallback to in-memory storage. Tests cover persistence across gateway recreation and storage failure scenarios. ChangesAIT sandbox storage
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Sandbox
participant MemoryCache
participant PersistentStorage
Sandbox->>MemoryCache: Check cached key
MemoryCache-->>Sandbox: Return cached value when present
Sandbox->>PersistentStorage: Read or write namespaced JSON value
PersistentStorage-->>Sandbox: Return value or throw failure
Sandbox->>MemoryCache: Hydrate or retain in-memory value
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.sampo/changesets/ait-sandbox-persistent-storage.md:
- Line 2: Update the `@mpgd/adapter-ait` changeset release level from patch to
minor to reflect the newly exported AitSandboxStorage and
CreateAitSandboxBridgeOptions interfaces and the optional options parameter
added to createAitSandboxBridge.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: d3990996-e885-4956-9a69-9cc530ca44fc
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.sampo/changesets/ait-sandbox-persistent-storage.mdadapters/ait/src/index.test.tsadapters/ait/src/index.ts
Summary
Verification
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes