Skip to content

Bump jdx/mise-action from 5.1.2 to 5.2.4 - #74

Merged
moukoublen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/jdx/mise-action-5.2.4
Oct 30, 2026
Merged

moukoublen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/github_actions/jdx/mise-action-5.2.4

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Oct 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps jdx/mise-action from 5.1.2 to 5.2.4.

Release notes

Sourced from jdx/mise-action's releases.

v5.2.4: Reuse cached signed checksums when restoring mise

Jobs that restore mise from the cache no longer have to download its signed checksums from GitHub on every run, so a network failure at that step no longer fails a job that otherwise restored correctly.

Fixed

  • Restoring a cached mise no longer needs a network download of the checksums. The action checks the cached mise binary against the signed SHASUMS256.txt and its .minisig. Before this release it downloaded both files from GitHub on every run, even when the cache restored correctly. When that download failed, for example after repeated curl errors, the job failed. Now, once the signature checks out, the action saves both files as SHASUMS256-<version>.txt and .minisig in <mise_dir>/bin, which is part of the mise cache. On later runs it reads them from the restored cache and checks the minisign signature again before using them. If the files are missing, corrupt or tampered with, the action downloads them as it did before. There are no new inputs. (#708 by @​jdx)
    • Caches saved by earlier versions don't contain these files. The main cache is only saved on a cache miss, so runs keep downloading the checksums until the cache is saved again or its key changes.

Full Changelog: jdx/mise-action@v5.2.3...v5.2.4

v5.2.3: Faster cache key computation in large workspaces

The cache key no longer comes from searching the whole workspace for mise config files. In repos that already contain node_modules or vendor/bundle, this removes a delay of several minutes in "Restoring mise cache".

Fixed

  • "Restoring mise cache" no longer takes minutes after installing dependencies. To build the cache key, the action used to match about 25 **/… glob patterns. That meant it walked every subdirectory of the workspace, including node_modules and vendor/bundle, before checking the cache at all. When the action ran after a step like pnpm install or ruby/setup-ruby with bundler-cache: true, this could take 3–7 minutes. The action now looks for mise config files the same way mise does: only in the working directory and each parent directory up to the workspace root. It checks for mise.toml, .mise.toml, .config/mise/…, conf.d fragments, .tool-versions, and their local, env-specific and .lock variants. The step also logs Hashed mise config files in N.Ns. (#703 by @​jdx and @​corsicanec82)
    • If you set a custom cache_key that doesn't use {{file_hash}} or {{default}}, the action no longer hashes config files at all.
    • Config files in subdirectories, such as monorepo sub-projects, no longer affect the cache key. mise only loads them with --monorepo.
    • Cache keys change, so the first run after you upgrade will miss the cache.

New Contributors

Full Changelog: jdx/mise-action@v5.2.2...v5.2.3

v5.2.2: Include conf.d config fragments in the cache key

The cache key now includes mise conf.d/*.toml config fragments, so changing one of them invalidates the cache.

Fixed

  • Editing a conf.d fragment now invalidates the cache. mise can load config from single-file fragments in conf.d/ directories, but the action didn't hash those files when it built the cache key. As a result, adding or changing tools in a fragment could restore an outdated cache. The cache key now also hashes conf.d/*.toml files under .config/mise/, .mise/ and mise/. If your repo already uses these fragments, the cache will miss once after you upgrade. (#698 by @​rileymichael)

New Contributors

Full Changelog: jdx/mise-action@v5.2.1...v5.2.2

v5.2.1: Require the signed packslip for mise 2026.9.3 and later

The action now refuses to install mise 2026.9.3 or later if the release's signed packslip is missing. This closes a gap where verification could be downgraded to the weaker checksum check.

Fixed

  • A missing packslip no longer weakens the check on recent mise releases. v5.2.0 started checking the mise binary against the release's signed packslip.sigstore.json. If that file wasn't found, though, the action quietly fell back to the minisign-signed SHASUMS256 checksums. Anyone who could hide the file could force the weaker check. Every mise release from 2026.9.3 on includes a packslip, so for those versions a missing bundle now stops the install with an error like this:
    mise v2026.10.11 must ship a signed packslip, but https://github.com/jdx/mise/releases/download/v2026.10.11/packslip.sigstore.json was not found
    
    Releases before 2026.9.3 don't include a packslip, so they're still checked against the signed checksums. A version string that isn't three dot-separated numbers also requires a packslip. If you set the sha256 input, it still takes precedence over both checks. A packslip that fails verification still never falls back to the checksums. (#695 by @​jdx)

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from jdx/mise-action's changelog.

5.2.4 - 2026-10-26

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • (cache) reuse signed checksums saved with a cached mise (#708) by @​jdx in #708

5.2.3 - 2026-10-24

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • (cache) hash mise config files without walking the workspace (#703) by @​jdx in #703

5.2.2 - 2026-10-21

🐛 Bug Fixes

New Contributors


5.2.1 - 2026-10-19

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • require the signed packslip for mise 2026.9.3 and later (#695) by @​jdx in #695

5.2.0 - 2026-10-16

🚀 Features

  • (cache) rebuild the cache every 30 days by default (#689) by @​jdx in #689
  • (cache) retry throttled cache restores and saves (#692) by @​jdx in #692
  • verify the mise binary against its signed packslip (#693) by @​jdx in #693

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • export the PATH entries mise reports with mise env --paths (#685) by @​jdx in #685

🔍 Other Changes

📚 Documentation

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [jdx/mise-action](https://github.com/jdx/mise-action) from 5.1.2 to 5.2.4.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/jdx/mise-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/jdx/mise-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](jdx/mise-action@v5.1.2...v5.2.4)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: jdx/mise-action
  dependency-version: 5.2.4
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code labels Oct 30, 2026
@moukoublen
moukoublen merged commit 7fa997e into main Oct 30, 2026
7 checks passed
@moukoublen
moukoublen deleted the dependabot/github_actions/jdx/mise-action-5.2.4 branch October 30, 2026 18:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant