Skip to content

Update 1T model and catalytic boundary condition handling in NEMO - #13

Merged
raghava-davuluri merged 1 commit into
HG-mainfrom
feature_jacobians_clean
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

Update 1T model and catalytic boundary condition handling in NEMO#13
raghava-davuluri merged 1 commit into
HG-mainfrom
feature_jacobians_clean

Conversation

@raghava-davuluri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Proposed Changes

Give a brief overview of your contribution here in a few sentences.
This PR updates the 1-temperature (1T) model and catalytic boundary condition handling
in the NEMO solver.

Related Work

Resolve any issues (bug fix or feature request), note any related PRs, or mention interactions with the work of others, if any.
This work builds on existing NEMO solver infrastructure in the lab codebase and does not directly resolve a tracked issue.
No related pull requests at this time.

PR Checklist

Put an X by all that apply. You can fill this out after submitting the PR. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask! We want to help. These are a guide for you to know what the reviewers will be looking for in your contribution.

  • I am submitting my contribution to the develop branch.
  • My contribution generates no new compiler warnings (try with --warnlevel=3 when using meson).
  • My contribution is commented and consistent with SU2 style (https://su2code.github.io/docs_v7/Style-Guide/).
  • I used the pre-commit hook to prevent dirty commits and used pre-commit run --all to format old commits.
  • I have added a test case that demonstrates my contribution, if necessary.
  • I have updated appropriate documentation (Tutorials, Docs Page, config_template.cpp), if necessary.

@raghava-davuluri
raghava-davuluri merged commit 500396e into HG-main Feb 5, 2026
0 of 2 checks passed
@raghava-davuluri
raghava-davuluri deleted the feature_jacobians_clean branch February 5, 2026 04:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants