Skip to content

ci: Add release approval pending notify workflow to default branch#1951

Merged
hatayama merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/release-approval-pending-notify-main
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

ci: Add release approval pending notify workflow to default branch#1951
hatayama merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/release-approval-pending-notify-main

Conversation

@hatayama

@hatayama hatayama commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

User Impact

  • schedule/workflow_run events only ever trigger from a workflow definition on the repository's default branch (main), no matter which branch owns the implementation the workflow calls into. Without this file present here too, the notify workflow added in ci: Notify pending release approvals via auto-managed issue #1950 would sit dormant except when manually run via workflow_dispatch.
  • This file is byte-identical to the one on v3-beta. Its checkout step pins ref: v3-beta, since that's where the reconcile command (cli/release-automation/cmd/notify-pending-release-approvals) actually lives — main has no cli/ directory.

Changes

Verification

Companion to #1950.

Review in cubic

schedule and workflow_run triggers only fire from workflow files that
live on the default branch (main), regardless of which branch the
implementation targets. This file is byte-identical to the one on
v3-beta (see PR #1950), which is where the reconcile command
(cli/release-automation/cmd/notify-pending-release-approvals) actually
lives; its checkout step pins ref: v3-beta so the scheduled run finds
it. Companion to v3-beta PR #1950.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@hatayama, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 18 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b2be7848-2d8e-45b2-89dd-124b3951eb0a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 98b4ab0 and fdb8094.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/release-approval-pending-notify.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch ci/release-approval-pending-notify-main

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hatayama
hatayama merged commit ade043d into main Jul 22, 2026
5 checks passed
@hatayama
hatayama deleted the ci/release-approval-pending-notify-main branch July 22, 2026 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant