Plan bounded Ofsted Essex delay slice - #93
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Jul 13, 2026
happygeneralist
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 18, 2026 16:38
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
Add one planning note for issue #91. This PR defines the exact boundary for the next bounded Ofsted Essex ingestion slice before candidate evidence or knowledge-object work begins.
What changed
assessment of needsmust not be silently narrowed toEHC needs assessmentwithout source support.Nearby-object conclusion
The planning review found no direct existing object that should automatically receive the delay evidence:
PP_002may be contextually relevant but is not the same condition as delay.UN_015andUN_007are not directly supported by the inspection wording.UN_010remains lineage only.BEH_009depends on the excludedpush hardmaterial rather than this delay slice.Absence of a direct fit does not authorise creating a new pain point before the candidate evidence review.
What did not change
Expected validation effect
The next PR should be able to build a candidate evidence table without collapsing several delay conditions into one pain point or causal chain, and without letting the EHC statutory mechanism define an enduring user need.
Related work
happygeneralist/design-intelligence-orchestration#10