Skip to content

Improvements#296

Closed
MBkkt wants to merge 5 commits into
google:masterfrom
MBkkt:pathes
Closed

Improvements#296
MBkkt wants to merge 5 commits into
google:masterfrom
MBkkt:pathes

Conversation

@MBkkt

@MBkkt MBkkt commented Jan 6, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

}
if (level == true_max_level || !options_.optimize_for_space()) {
// Add an ancestor term for this cell at the constrained level.
terms.push_back(GetTerm(TermType::ANCESTOR, id.parent(level), prefix));

@MBkkt MBkkt Jan 6, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

id.parent(level) == id is always true here because level == id.level() see old line 177 (or new 192)

@jmr

jmr commented Jan 6, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Having 6 PRs in 1 will quickly become unwieldy. Please split up future PRs for easier disucssion.

@MBkkt

MBkkt commented Jan 6, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Having 6 PRs in 1 will quickly become unwieldy. Please split up future PRs for easier disucssion.

Will be done

@smcallis

smcallis commented Jan 6, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yeah let's split this one up we can probably submit the others separate from the term indexer one.

@MBkkt

MBkkt commented Jan 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jmr @smcallis Hello, I created separate PRs (found asan issue and add tests for new option) can you look they?

@jmr

jmr commented Jan 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing this since it's been split into #298, #299, #300, #301, #302, and #303.

@jmr jmr closed this Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants