Implement brown carbon with photolysis - #3301
Draft
megan-he wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks @megan-he. I'm adding a note here that this PR also requires merge of geoschem/Cloud-J#35. |
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Name and Institution (Required)
Name: Megan He
Institution: Harvard University
Describe the update
This PR implements brown carbon (BrC) in GEOS-Chem following the optical property approach of Hammer et al. (2016), with the main purpose of investigating its effect on photolysis and global [OH]. Rather than introducing a new BrC tracer, we apply Hammer et al.'s effective imaginary refractive index values at BrC/POC = 1.0. From Hammer et al.: "The columns with effective k values for BrC/POC fraction of unity offer the convenience of representing the effective absorption by BrC without needing to assume an arbitrary BrC/POC fraction, or to introduce a separate BrC tracer. The effective k values for unity BrC/POC fraction can be thought of as the effective imaginary refractive index for an internal mixture of BrC and colorless POC."
BrC optical properties are read from the existing
/n/holylfs06/LABS/jacob_lab/Everyone/GEOS-CHEM/gcgrid/gcdata/ExtData/CHEM_INPUTS/CLOUD_J/v2025-01/FJX_scat-aer.datentries derived from Hammer et al., with density = 1.3 g/cm3. BrC is treated as hygroscopic. Many of the changes are related to aerosol indexing due to the additional aerosol species.Expected changes
Gao et al. (2026) treats all organic aerosol originated from residential combustion sector as BrC. So in a 1-year 2024 test simulation, 100% of biofuel OC (CEDS, DICE-Africa) and biomass burning OC (GFED4) is treated as fresh BrC, which is consistent with the BrC/POC = 1.0 approach in Hammer et al. Note that applying Hammer et al.'s optical properties to biofuel BrC is likely a conservative lower bound on biofuel BrC absorption.
JO1D values and OH concentrations decrease most strongly in biomass burning and biofuel regions, but global mean differences are minimal (<0.5%). Difference plots between the 1-year 2024 test simulation (with 6-month spinup) and a reference simulation for Jan and July at the surface and at 500 hPa are attached below. (In the OH surface plots, I masked out where reference OH was very low/near zero, essentially NH in winter.)
Reference(s)
Hammer, M. S., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Buchard, V., Torres, O., Ridley, D. A., and Spurr, R. J. D. (2016). Interpreting the ultraviolet aerosol index observed with the OMI satellite instrument to understand absorption by organic aerosols: implications for atmospheric oxidation and direct radiative effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2507–2523. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2507-2016
Gao, Y., Liu, M., Zhou, R., Cai, X., Zhang, H., Song, Y., et al. (2026). Significant radiative absorption of brown carbon aerosols from residential fuel combustion in developing regions. Geophysical Research Letters, 53, e2026GL121829. https://doi.org/10.1029/2026GL121829