Add event-sourced many-market wind tunnel#22
Draft
krandder wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Conversation
krandder
force-pushed
the
codex/lane5-agent-work
branch
from
July 13, 2026 03:45
eb808c2 to
b12a642
Compare
krandder
force-pushed
the
codex/lane6-windtunnel
branch
from
July 13, 2026 04:18
65ec34e to
d878033
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
Lane 6 needs reproducible autonomous operation across independent FAOs without weakening the one-active-evaluation/one-conditional-market invariant. P1a closes the gap between log replay and safe keeper action construction. P1b proves that the same index/hydration path converges over ten full independent economic deployments while signing and any non-loopback broadcast remain outside the package.
Ancestry
040ca17(codex/lane5-agent-work)358442e0d7ad1dd878033Safety boundary
127.0.0.1RPC, requires a fresh zero-nonce Anvil, and uses disposable unlocked accountstype(...).creationCodemetadata—are the deployment trust boundary; Python checks all blobs before send and receipts re-check core/FLM hashes on-chainsuccess: falseartifacts; success is written only after stable replay and all ten postconditionsEVALUATINGproposal, no queued second proposal, no evaluator market yet, and an independent spot-mode FLMValidation after rebase
forge fmt --check,git diff --check, andforge build --sizes: green0x45d0ee726f5ac83cb03cf71090864fd78452a1e6e734b3e838f5f9f5d39a3649activeEvaluationProposalId=10x5c7ea50b2f216b56bc152834f4fdde07e0c038de95e24f38d1f548283e8c11860xb21d2dd3b2011f1108db513f6411d397a5bef36aabbf7caa15b0806514f5afe8Remaining gap
Inject an external signer under the existing funding caps and exercise a controlled non-loopback deployment only when explicitly authorized. RPC fault injection, 100/1000 tiers, subsidy automation, evaluator market lifecycle/FLM conditional migration at scale, and UI remain later slices.